Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 August 2002 17:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Hi All, There's a rumour starting to spread around the North East that the use of rigger boots on construction sites is no longer legal. The rationale appears to be the lack of ankle support, and thence ankle injuries. This could of course have emanated from an individual employers' review of a series of accidents and thence a risk assessment concluding that lace up safety footwear should be used...probably with the implication that safety wellies are also out of favour. Can anyone shed some more light on this one? Regards, Peter
Admin  
#2 Posted : 29 August 2002 22:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie Hi Peter, It is a new one on me and I find the idea that the use of rigger boots would be made illegal highly unlikely . I can see a logic in a risk assessment identifying rigger boots as "not suitable in some situations." However, the same could be said of ordinary boots in situations such as work over/near water, where the rigger boot is easier to take of should anyone fall into the water. Personally I have used rigger boots for some years now and have yet to find a situation (other than wading in water) where I conclude that they were not suitable. Regards Martyn Hendrie
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 August 2002 22:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Randall Hi Peter, Use of rigger's boots or any other specific type of PPE would not be "illegal" in the sense that it would be a breach of any statutory provision in and of itself. However if rigger's boots are issued and prove to be inappropriate, and an injury results, there would be scope for enforcement action by the Enforcing Authority who would be likely to invoke the HASAW Act Section 2.1 and the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations. It's all down to "suitable and sufficient" risk assessment. Hope this helps. Bob Randall
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.