Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 April 2003 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Malcolm Hogarth I have been asked for guidance on the subject of employing people with specific difficulties and wonder if anyone out there can share their experiences. The first employee cannot read or write and the second employee has Retinis Pigmentosa. I do not have any great concerns about the employee who cannot read or write as there are ways of communicating verbally. We would consider carefully the tasks he would be undertaking and I would be closely involved with specific risk assessments for him. The second person is a bit more difficult and raises a number of concerns particularly as we are a factory environment. We obviously cannot be seen to discriminate and If anybody has experience of either of these issues I would love to hear from you. Thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 April 2003 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Large http://www.jobcentreplus...orEmployers/AccesstoWork If I were you I'd contact Disability Services who can help via their 'Access to Work' scheme. Apart from helping with costs for special equipment they can provide a free assessment and advice you of what it will take to get someone working safely and effectively for you. Surprisingly they even advise you against employing someone if it really isn't advisable. Very rare though.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 April 2003 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor The nearest we have is an almost-blind non-hearing, non-speaking gardener in one of our schools (communication is mainly by writing very large on a large whiteboard). Risk assessment has had to address the person, the work environment and the tasks performed and a number of very specific controls have been introduced such as: padding various protrusions; tactile paving to the pond perimeter; fencing exposed glazing to the greenhouse; reporting and notification arrangements - particularly for fire procedures; ensuring others are aware of the situation (particularly the pupils); etc, etc. I believe that with very careful assessment, supervision and monitoring we can show that we have done what is reasonable to ensure the individual's safety, discharge our duties and enable a valued member of staff to continue in employment. Disabled persons tend to operate within their limitations and seem not to contribute disproportionately to the accident statistics.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.