Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 June 2004 20:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By k p connor
As with football referee's over the years! Over the past months working across areas of the UK I am becoming frustrated by the inconsistency of the inspectors. Not only in different areas but also in the same regional office. The level or quality of documentation and actions taken seems dependant upon which inspector you come into contact with. Is anyone else battling with this situation, i.e. where one inspector requires extensive documentation, the same level of documentation is strongly castigated by another.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 June 2004 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 June 2004 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglas
Every Human Being has a different Interpretation, of rules and regulations, if there are grey areas in these rules and regulations, people will interpret it as they see fit....


Human Nature


Aye,


Rod
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 June 2004 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sean Fraser
An inevitable result of goal-setting principles and under-funding.

The HSE has a responsibility to interpret the legal requirements appropriately and to come to a "position" that they will apply to practical issues, then communicate this position to their own personnel and through them to the organisations they deal with. Clarifications should only then be necessary on specifics, not on general principles.

I agree with the advice of the previous respondents - you should take any written evidence you have and take the matter to the management of the local HSE office, expressing your ligitimate concern that conflicting advice is creating anxiety and concern in your organisation as there is now uncertainty in how to apply the legislative requirements appropriately and hence avoid the potential for improvement notices and prosecution - which can harm your corporate image in the eyes of your stakeholders.

It is always difficult to deal with inconistency of this nature, especially when it involves a statutory body. However, I would hope that raising your concerns with your local office would be received positively and that they will take appropriate steps to ensure you reach a satisfactory level of mutual understanding on how to proceed. Proof will always be in the pudding though - when the next inspector calls!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 24 June 2004 11:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi1


The recent HSE Srategy has tried to address this indirectly:-

http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/hsc/strategy2010.pdf

Under the heading "HSE and LAs working together"

We have looked closely at the current
division of enforcement responsibility
between LAs and HSE and their ways of
working. There is no lasting logic to the
current arrangements. They are complex,
confusing and based on boundaries and
approaches that suit more the convenience
of the regulator than the needs of business
or the workforce. They do not capture the full potential of HSE and LAs to work together. etc etc..........
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 June 2004 20:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mork
k p

The following will help HSE take consistent prosecutions etc.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/emm.pdf
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.