Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 August 2004 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Huffadine
Most Nursing and Residential Care Homes for the Elderly operate a "stay-put" policy. This means that in the event of a fire the reisdents who may be confused or physically disabled stay in their rooms until or unless they are asked to evacuate.

This works perfectly well when all of the precautionary measures are properly installed. One of the vital component parts that adds to the robustness of this procedure is the calling of the Fire Service as soon as the alarm is initiated.

I guess the Fire Service, understandably, are getting fed up of false alarms and in some areas of the country are now requiring care home operators to investigate the cause of the alarm before dialling 999.

The Home Office "Draft Guide to Precautions in Residential Care premises", the HSE "Fire Safety - An Employers Guide", the Northern Ireland Firecode, etc, etc. do not prescribe the action to be taken in the event of a fire.

We will not be complying with this instruction from the Fire Service, particualrly in the light of the events that appear to have led to the North Lanarkshire Care Home fire earlier this year.

What are your thoughts?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 August 2004 13:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler
have you carried out a fire risk assessment of the building/s?
The proposed changes to incorperate RCH's has been taken into concideration.
The care homes I have personally inspected fall well below the minimum required standard.
What are you going to do about it?
Regards.
Jonathan Sandler
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 August 2004 14:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond
Hi Chris

Hope you are well. I agree with you about this. This is surprising. We have found fire officers to be more stringent and less flexible following the Scottish care home fire.

One of our homes in Shropshire was investigated by fire officers recently following false alarms. Their recommendations concerned changing to optical detectors downstairs but nothing about investigating the fire first.

Where we have a stay put policy, I usually advise the care home managers to install an autodial facility.

Did you know that false alarms in rural areas are often caused by storm flies. This can be prevented by putting a flea collar round the base of the detector! - I heard this on the 3 counties radio when they were interviewing a fire research scientist.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 August 2004 14:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Huffadine
Fire risk assessments have been done but this is a bigger topic than managemnet systems. Design and capital investment relating to procedures are more pertinent.

Pleased to hear that inspections are being carried out.

Nigel - Like the flea collar idea! I will recommend it to one of our rural homes where this is a problem.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 August 2004 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kenny McGillivray
I think it's back to basics for some nursing homes like many others. During recent discussions with duty manager of local care home she had no idea whether she should phone the Fire Brigade or did the alarm system auto dial.

Some mess at 2 in the morning!!

procedures certainly needing sorted!!

Kenny
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 August 2004 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Huffadine
Kenny is right. Mixed messages lead to inappropriate action.

The fire alarms sound at 2.30 in the morning - what do we do? Will I get into trouble if I call the Fire Brigade before I investigate? Or should I investigate first and lose precious time?

It seems that if you do not obey instructions from some Fire Officers, go ahead and dial 999 before investigating, you will be in trouble!

Let's keep the message clear dial then investigate.

If this is about keeping costs down, why not do what one authority are proposing, that is, send one tender intially. This still allows the person reporting to do so starightaway - no ambiguity.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 August 2004 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster
Any firefighter I know would rather spend a lifetime attending false alarms than have to recover a single charred corpse.

However, I think the point some Brigades are trying to make is that there are many premises where false alarms are commonplace, but no real attempt has been made to reduce their incidence.

If you work with them to ensure you are using the most appropriate type of detection equipment, properly located to avoid triggering by steam, cooking fumes, fag smoke, toasters etc etc., and protected as far as possible against electrical "events" then it is unlikely that they are going to charge for what should be a once-in-a-while false alarm.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.