Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 September 2004 08:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve D. Clarke
I’ve had an enquiry from one of our rights-of-way managers, apparently staff who install footpath signs/stiles etc on roadside verges are required to have the same qualifications as highways staff who actually work in the carriageway.

I have looked at the relevant regulations i.e. The New Roads and Street Works Act 1991, The Street Works (Qualifications of Supervisors and Operatives) Regulations 1992, The Highways Act 1980 and Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 8 Volume 1.

My understanding is that as far as the law is concerned the Highway is defined as the area between the boundary fences including any verges, shoulders, medians, footways, cycletracks and carriageways.

So basically if you are working between the boundary fences/hedges of a highway these regulations apply and there must always be at least one trained Operative, having a prescribed qualification on site. Also such work must be supervised by a person having a prescribed qualification as a Supervisor.

The training involves three units 1, 2 and 3 for accreditation for working in the highway (Unit 1 location and avoidance of underground services; Unit 2 signing, lighting and guarding; Unit 3 excavation in the highway).

It isn’t a problem (but expensive) getting all permanent staff trained at an accredited centre, but it will mean that voluntary groups that work at the weekend will no longer be used. Have I got this wrong? The law appears black and white in this area, is this training necessary, does anyone have experience or can offer advice in this area?
Cheers
Steve
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 September 2004 21:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robin Pelling
I am involved directly with Streetworks Qualifications and would like to clarify that the qualifications under the NRASWA 1991 relate directly to Utilities and their contractors. They are not legally intended for those who otherwise carry out the work you describe, but can be used. There are courses run at highway training centres, see www.hcta.co.uk, for verge maintnance and roadworks signing.
Chapter 8 of the Traffic Signs Manual (DtR) requires any person working on the highway to be appropriatly trained

Also see www.streetworks.info
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 September 2004 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle
Rob, forgive me if i'm wrong, but I thought the NRSWA applied to all highways, and thus all areas of all highways, and of course footpaths and by-ways, if designated under the highways act, are also highways - the only difference being their classication for 'traffic' permitted to use them.

Having been involved with the NRSWA since Prof Micheal Horne (now deceased) first presented his report (the Horne Report) - at the Institute of Works and Highways Management (as was) annual seminar in Harrogate back in the 80's I have had some detailed involvement.

It was and is my understanding that the only persons who were ever exempted from the NRSWA were Highway Authority Engineers, who due to the fact they qualified Engineers were exempted by way of their qualifications.

It is my experience however, that most have actually done the necessary NRSWA courses in order to cover the areas they are involved with, beit excavations, reinstatements and supervision etc...in the various if not all elements (bituminous materials, concrete, elements etc...)

Whilst it may appear to many that excavating in a grass verge is not excavating the highway per se, legally (in most cases) they may well be part of the highway (unless it is private and/or not designated as a part of the highway) and will, most liklely contain many of the utility services associated with the highway, such as gas, electricity, water, cable and telephone services, drainage (surface and foul), and of course not forgeting the NRSWA requirements in respect of tree roots (to ensure trees are not destablised.

I would therefore have some concerns if persons working in any part of the adopted highway, including carriageways, footways, footpaths, verges, by-ways etc (which can also carry services) were not in possesion of suitable qualifications and experience covering the operations they were required to perform.

Lastly, the requirements, as you have pointed out, is that only one person on the site need to hold the relevant qualifications. This could be a supervisor (if they hold all the relevant qualifications), but it needs to be remembered that the qualified person must be on site at all times that works are being undertaken, so multi-site operations would be problematic...

If your opinion differs, please lets hear it...

Regards...

Stuart Nagle
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 September 2004 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robin Pelling

When the NRASWA Qualifications for Operatives and Supervisors where introduced, it was informally agreed at the time for Authorities to adopt the same principles as utilities, as you are aware. It has over the years been used as a contract requirement of most authorities where no other formal qualification exists and to ensure the competence of those on-site. There has also been a fair amount of miss-interpretation from those offering the qualifications in respect of who 'legally' needs to hold it. The qualifications are suitable for any person working on the highway whether it be streetworks or highway works. Back in the good old days most authorities carried out reinstatement on behalf of the utilities, this has declined due to privatisiation, etc. There was a situation where a gardiner in Wales was requested to hold the qualification for planting flower beds on roundabouts, it hit the newspapers.

General Note for readers;
The streetworks site must have at least one qualified operative on-site at all times when work is being undertaken, and the site must be adequately supervised. The supervisor need not be on-site all the times. Holding the supervisor qualification does not subsume the requirements for a qualified operative and one person cannot fulfil both roles on one site. This last was confimed by Dtr and the Awarding Bodies during the recent revision of the qualifications and product updates. It is also worthy of note that next year sees the introduction of 5 yearly re-assessment to be able to be kept on the register.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 September 2004 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle
Robert.

Thanks for responding. Glad to see we have a consensus of opinion, and information on the update to the qualifications of a 5 yearly renewal.

The renewal of course will come a bit hard on those who are full-time employed professionals in this area of work, be they roadworkers or Engineers, but when one considers the turnover in labour in the private sector, one can appreciate the need to ensure that operatives obtain and/or maintain the correct level of competence.

Regards...

Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.