Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 September 2004 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark R. Devlin
Is their a requirement for forklift trucks to be fitted with a seatbelt?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 September 2004 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad
Mark
As far as I know, all counterbalance trucks have to be fitted with seatbelts. Reach type trucks are exempt from this because of the seating position and direction of travel.
I may be wrong, but this is my understanding.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 17 September 2004 10:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood
A risk assessment is required to determine the need but there are precedents. If the truck is fitted with ROPS (Roll Over Protection System) then you should have a belt fitted to prevent the driver falling out of the seat if the vehicle turns over, potentially trapping the body between the ROPS and the ground. If no ROPS fitted then no belt would normally be required - try and get them to wear a belt in any case!! the key feature is to ensure a high level of accredited training is committed to for drivers - there are many very poor FLT trainers about! - and regular retesting to ensure the vehicle is driven safely, over stable ground as far as possible.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 17 September 2004 20:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Personally, I cant see much utility in wearing a seat belt within a plant or warehouse on level ground. The chance of tipping or roll-over is very low. However, if the flt goes up or down ramps or is on uneven ground (building site) or is side loading lorries then it is a good idea.

Merv Newman
Admin  
#5 Posted : 17 September 2004 23:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Johnson
I fully agree with Merv, we had trucks operating on good level floors, following risk assessment it was decided to tie back the belts, as due to the high number of times getting on and off the truck the greater risk was from tripping over or entanglement with the belt causing potential falls from the truck.

Risk assessment is the key

Alan
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 September 2004 00:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alistair Reid
HSE Information sheet MISC241, downloadable from the HSE website deals with this subject.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 September 2004 23:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tim
I think that most of the significant injuries associated with FLT use are due to it overturning and trapping the driver. My personnel view is that drivers should wear a belt and I think this is the HSE's directive, but I may be wrong.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.