Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Hi all, Heres a thought!! A man has facial hair due to his reglious beliefs, but he has to wear RPE as part of his work activities. The facial hair will break the seal affording him no protection from airbourne, mists, dusts, vapours etc. What would you do do? Aye Rod
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Jackson My take on it would be - does the job require the use of RPE as there is no other method of controlling the risk? If the answer is Yes then some form of RPE has to be used. So, sit down with the chap himself and go through the available types - can you get something which is a good alternative to a mask. For example, would he be able / willing to wear an air-fed visor with filtering. That way you're not reliant on the seal of a mask - I would think there must be a solution here. Its pricier than an ordinary mask, but would solve the problem. If you can't find anything that he can wear and the beard cannot go, then you must remove him from the job.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hilary Charlton Assume given that the facial hair is religious that this gentleman is a sikh and also, therefore, has a turban? Therefore, a hard top visor is out of the question as this will not fit over the turban. However, there are a number of soft top airfed visors available that will fit over the turban and do not require a seal around the beard area. They are more expensive but there's no option on this one. I buy the majority of my stuff from Arco and they have a wide range of options for you and your employee to sit down and have a look at. They also have an online catalogue at www.arco.co.uk. Hilary
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Adam, Thats my take on it? However I am now going to move the goal posts, the same guy is now in the Army and serving in Iraq or some other theatre of War with a Nuclear, Biological & Chemical (NBC)threat, he is an esssential part of the Electronic Communications Team and it is vital that he is sent there, the only respirator available is the Respirator issued to all members of the Armed Services which is a "face fit" respirator. What next? Aye, Rod
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Interesting one, this. Is the RPE used for comfort during work, to prevent airborne paticulates from being inhaled, or to prevent cross-contamination(food processing etc)? When you say "has to use". Has he been told on what basis. I'm assuming that you indicate that a filtering facepiece is to be worn and not a half or full face respirator. The only thing I can think of is a powered hood to protect him. Otherwise a beard "snoot" and face piece if it's for cross contam prevention reasons. Whoever emloyed the gentleman to work in that area could have identified the pending issue
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly I was under the impression that duties under H&S law can override those relating to discrimination - ie the headteacher at the school where a Muslim girl wanted to wear a more modest hijab, said that this had H&S implications in terms of the extra cloth being a tripping hazard and teachers not being able to readily identify pupils if their faces were covered. Be interested to know what people's experience of this issue is. Jennifer
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 October 2004 11:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Rod, if the guy was in the army he would not be sent to a strategic combat zone he would not be able to wear the issue helmet, would not be able to effectively wear the new NBC suit, would not be able to decontaminate himself, would not be able to wear the respirator as you indicated therefore if he was subjected to a nerve, blood or incapacitating agent, he would die and that is not what the forces are about, and has nothing to do with Occ safety and health, so your goalposts are really far apart. With respect.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 21 October 2004 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karen Todd Whilst I don't have any experiences of the forces, I have friends who have. I was told of one person in the army who is vegetarian. I had imagined that he would just have to make do with not eating meat from the meals available. However, I was told that he gets his own meals made specially, to make sure he gets the nutrition he needs (an army marches on it's stomach and all that). So, if this could be accomodated, then could your issue be accomodated? Also, although I do not work in the oil industry, I understand they have a clean-shaven rule. How does this work? Or are people made aware of the rule when applying for the jobs and told that if they can't work to the clean shaven rule then don't bother to apply for the job? Regards, Karen
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 October 2004 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Del Basi Rod As an orthodox Sikh myself, I was very interested in the message you posted. I worked as an asbestos analyst many years ago and used a hooded blouse to protect myself. However, as I was not sure of the environment that your operative was due to work in, I decided to do some research to look for other alternatives. On my return to the forum, I have been very encouraged by the responses posted thus far. I am particularly pleased by the genuine effort by colleagues to look for suitable alternatives. As for my findings, a search on Yahoo for 'facial, hair, RPE' gave me links to some very informative sites. One of these was an MoD site (again particularly interesting in view of your 2nd posting)and the advice is as follows: 'For employees with facial hair, the use of hoods, visors, blouses or air fed suits is recommended where they are suitable alternatives to equipment relying on a face seal.' I hope the above information is of use to you and that the person is able to undertake his tasks safely, in what seems to be a very hostile environment. Kind regards
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 October 2004 12:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Straun, Are you in the Forces? Del you are spot on the Miltary have alternative Respirators for Personnel who have facial hair for Religous reasons and also for Naval Personnel who are allowed to have facial hair, also Pioneer Sergeants who are required to have Beards. Straun, If you join up you go where you are told!! Ask The 1st Battalion Black Watch!!!! However it might have changed since I was in I left the Army after 22 years in July 2001.............. Aye Rod
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 October 2004 12:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Karen, the last sentence of your posting is very real indeed in British industry. Del Basi, your search re MOD is correct but only if personnel are involved in centralised mass-decontamination post at a (very very far away) rear eschelon.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Rod-- I'm been tried and tested and got loads of Tee shirts vd, bars and scars. The old adage of "you'll go where your told" largely depends on which Arm. In the army and navy, if there was a risk of NBC during a conflict then the order of clean shaven is adopted.In all my years I've yet to come accross a buddy buddy decon with one guy wearing a hood and the other wearing a std issue respirator. Remember H&S etc etc is thrown out the window during any conflict. Am I going on!!!!!!!! Are there any turban wearing Black Watch Jocks out there?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass With what "Arm" do you serve Straun? You are obviously a Member of the Armed Force or work with the MoD. Aye, Rod
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan R.E. first in last out
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Ah Royal Engineers' Gentlemen of The Royal Engineers and men of other Corps. Are you still serving? Aye, Rod
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Yes with attached R.N at the moment, but lets not be too inquisitive thankyou Rod! I crop up from time to time.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Understand, If you told me you would have to kill me. Aye, Rod
Admin  
#18 Posted : 21 October 2004 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad The "clean shaven" policy has been adopted by some companies who deal in products where personal protection, cross contamination and hygiene is a big issue e.g. pharmaceutical manufacture. I know of a rather large pharmaceutical manufacturer with a chain of high street stores who adopted a "clean shaven" policy some years ago. The policy was that being clean shaven for existing employees was encouraged, but on a purely voluntary basis. New employees signed up to the policy as part of the contract of employment. The only exeptions are on religeous or medical reasons and specific provisions are made in these cases.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 21 October 2004 16:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Adams If the guy is serving (in theatre or not) he has been issued with a standard respirator which comes in 4 sizes, had the training and passed a fit test, which is done in a gas chamber with CS gas. You really get to know about it if you don't achieve a seal. NBC agents behave indiscriminately and have no respect for religious beliefs, therefore no allowances are made. As previously stated, decontamination is by buddy system and I have never been made aware of a possible requirement to assist in decontaminating someone wearing different kit. Also, on board, breathing apparatus for fire fighting is of one type only. Sea going Naval personnel tend to remain clean shaven or have a closely trimmed beard as we are all fire fighters at sea. On the civilian side, we recently had a project with potential asbestos exposure. We did training and fit testing for all concerned and made a requirement that all employed on the contract were clean shaven for the duration. One employee refused and was not put on the project. There were no religious grounds, but if there were, I would still have barred him from that project and put him on alternative work.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 21 October 2004 20:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Where do you get the idea that H&S is thrown out of the window in any conflict? The Minister may suspend it at his/her discretion, however............ At the time of the first Gulf War I attempted to get COSHH exemption for those personnel from my base who were in theatre, i.e. actually there, doing it. Exemption was refused, and responsibility was passed down to local commanders on the spot. So far as I am aware no such exemption was ever issued, locally or otherwise. If it had been you can bet that Gulf War Syndrome would have been hung on some poor young 2nd Lieut. two weeks out of Sandhurst! Laurie
Admin  
#21 Posted : 21 October 2004 21:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Thatcher Rod, Re your revised question, there are two responses of interest posted on the MoD Equal Opportunities Q and A page - Muslim men are permitted to wear short neatly trimmed beards. However, for occupational or operational reasons, where a hazard clearly exists, Muslim men may be required to modify or remove facial hair to such an extent as to enable the correct wearing of breathing apparatus, oxygen masks, or respirators. An effective seal on a respirator can only be achieved when the skin is clean shaven; not withstanding this, Muslim men will not be required to shave their beards in order to perform NBC training drills. And - An effective seal on a respirator can only be achieved when the skin is clean shaven. In an operational environment where there is an NBC threat, Sikhs or other personnel with beards will need to shave. However, when practicing NBC drills, male Sikh personnel would not be required to shave their beards. ... Paul
Admin  
#22 Posted : 22 October 2004 14:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Del Basi Rod Once again, thank you for starting this tread. As for Straun's question about 'turban wearing Black Watch heroes'. I start by complimenting the men of Black Watch and wishing them all a safe return by Christmas. As for the Sikhs, we are a proud warrior caste with many regiments in the Indian army. NBC or no NBC threat, the Sikh soldiers would not look for reasons to avoid their duty. If you are in the armed forces your life can be on the line at any time. As for my own situation, soon after graduating in 1985, I went to an exhibition at Wembly conference centre looking for my first job. The stand that particularly attracted my attention belonged to the Army. However, the Officers at the stand laughed off my prospects of making a career in the army. I thought to myself, if they don't want me, why should I put my life on the line. As you can probably tell, I still regret letting myself be put off from persuing this honourable career. As far as RPE is concerned we all know that the fit is only one important aspect that needs to be considered. We also need to determine whether it is fit for purpose - for this you need to obviously consider the type of airborne contaminants; the concentaration levels; duration of exposure etc. As for the MoD instruction, for Sikhs to be clean shaven in operational environments with a threat of NBC - this would not be acceptable to an orthodox Sikh, in which case it ought to be possible for that person to perform other duties in support of his colleagues. Sorry about the long rambling nature of this message. My best wishes to the Black Watch and all other members of our armed forces.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 22 October 2004 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Struan Thankyou Del Basi. Laurie, no-one can find Sadams' COSHH assessment
Admin  
#24 Posted : 22 October 2004 18:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Rod. As you appear to be aware, facial hair and 'face fit masks for respirators/Breathing apparatus is a no-no, for very good reasons... You don't see fire fighters with beards do you! The all dancing all singing answer is an alternative seal method, that mainly being a 'neck-seal' on a hood type device. Only trouble with this is that they are best suited to positive pressure BA systems (whihc inflate the hood) and not so comfortable with respirator type devices (hood does not inflate). Regards... Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.