Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 October 2004 09:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James M Watching the Black Watch carrying out track maintenance on national TV leads me to ask do they have any PPE in the forces nowadays?? After Rod's question about RPE (face fit) I would personally be concentrating on the fundamentals. The driver with no helmet on, the person handling the track had no gloves, no overalls, no ear or eye protection. The question I would ask is why are these basic routine tasks not managed correctly? To win a battle you have to get to the start line first. Good luck to everyone moving north with and without PPE. Jim
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 October 2004 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Do happen to work in the same office as MarkSmark?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 October 2004 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith32 Wearing hear protection, you wouldn't hear 'incoming fire'. You would want to avoid high velocity lead poisoning, I would guess. Wearing gloves, you might not be be able to get your finger on to the trigger of your rifle (the trigger guard would get in the way. This would prevent you from using the control method you have been issued with - i.e. your rifle to fire back at the blighters, hence not removing the hazard - the enemy. I think this thread is a wind up - if not get real about the realities of military life...
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 October 2004 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James M Keith, The reality of military life is that 5% (growing by the year) of the annual MoD budget is spent on paying out claims to those individuals like those on TV who don't wear PPE when required to carry out routine tasks. (A warrior 511 will produce 105 dB of noise at tick over) That is our money, you and me, our tax that we pay every month because of neglect and poor supervision. A good military saying is ' If you fail to prepare - prepare to fail. Lucky for us, the 'others' prepare a lot less than we do. Is this a wind up??
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 October 2004 13:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Murray S Graham Regulation 12 of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992, states that an exemption certificate may be issued in the interest of national security,(self read for more info). I am also sure that there was an ammendment (No5) to the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, which excempt the military from this Act and associated Regulations in times of conflict. Speaking from experience if soldiers had to take all the PPE they should have, they would need a vehicle each to carry it all. Hope this answers your question. Murray Graham
Admin  
#6 Posted : 25 October 2004 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith32 Think I would prefer to risk occupational deafness from the engine noise from a Warrior APC (low hazard and longer term risk and would not kill you), rather than high velocity lead poisoning from an AK47 (high hazard and short term/immediate risk which is quite likely to kill)
Admin  
#7 Posted : 25 October 2004 14:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Okay James M, we got you. The TV (news)footage was actually done on a beach near St Andrews as part of a recruitment campaigne and also "wish you were here", and "songs of praise" programmes.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 25 October 2004 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston James I think you will find that the military has to distinguish between: 1. Routine peacetime work in barracks. 2. Wokr on Operations in a potentially hazardous (from the enemy!) environment. Example: 1. In peacetime you will not be allowed even as an observer on the firing point of a military range when furing is taking place without wearing ear protection. The same would apply on a practice range in an Operational theatre too. 2. While carrying out a section attack with the real thing the noise is the same (or worse) but you won't see any ear protection for obvious operational reasons. It's called operational necessity. Everyone in the military understands the difference between the precautions required during training and those on Operations. Heather
Admin  
#9 Posted : 25 October 2004 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith32 Well said, Heather. As I said I think the orginator of this thread, started this thread as a wind up. James M, contributed to the wind up too. As with a number of other contributors to this thread, I too am ex HM Forces, but not from the green suit brigade. Chocks away, Ginger! (for me), Tally Ho! But still did some basic infantry training etc
Admin  
#10 Posted : 25 October 2004 16:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson After a long career in the RN/RM with a green beret and served with Commando Forces around the world (now MIOSH,RSP etc), you civvies who have never 'stood the post' have no idea at all what is happening or what is goes on in a 'war zone', hang on sarge cant change that wheel yet as I dont have my PPE, my personal choice is an NBC suit, SA80 (preferably a MILAN anti tank weapon) and NGS and a helicopter gun ship! or are you taking the mick! In Mazlows heirachy of needs dont see PPE anywhere! Apologies beforehand if I upset any one!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 25 October 2004 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith32 I guess you could class an SA80 (piece of crap), SLR and Milan as a piece of PPE? After all they protect you personally... Sorry, I never saw the sharp end from a squaddies point of view, but lifting 1000lb laser guided bombs is a bit difficult. Also they don't fit into your Bergen too well, along with a re-heated, triple spool jet engine - but you could run a bit faster if you had one.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 25 October 2004 17:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jez Corfield Remember PPE is also low down on the risk control hierarchy…. Having advised on safety in these situations, I feel compelled to stick my nose in. There are two sides to this argument: Yes, there is a need to work safely in an operational area, to get to the ‘starting line’, but how much of the PPE mentioned is a precaution rather than a necessity? And don’t assume everything you see on TV is genuine; there is always a chance that a situation might be engineered to make some good background footage. Even in an operational area there are different levels of activity, in a base camp there will be a rudimentary workshop, and the REME bods would use some PPE, its part of their kit for taking on operations. However the crew of a Warrior need to be able to do this task quickly, out of camp, in a potentially hostile environment, in which case PPE would be an obvious hindrance. Funnily enough, troops tend to be a lot more alert to all types of danger in operational areas, and accident rates tend to go down. Jez
Admin  
#13 Posted : 25 October 2004 20:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie It's still a widely held, and mainly erroneous, belief that the armed forces are exempt from H&S legislation when in actual combat. While HM ships at sea do have such a general exemption, for the boys in brown and light blue such an exemption may, I repeat may, be signed by the Minister. So far as I am aware, no such exemption has ever been signed. I repeat my answer to the "RPE & Facial Hair" thread earlier. At the time of the first Gulf War I was acting as HSO at a base in Germany. I formally asked for such an exemption to be signed on behalf of the personnel from my unit, for whom I had HASAWA responsibilities, who were actually in theatre i.e. actually involved in front line combat operations. The exemption was refused, and I was advised that exemption was a matter for local commanders on the ground (which itself is not what the Act calls for). Of course, they didn't have much else to do at the time! If ever the MOD do get around to admitting that Gulf War Syndrome exists, the Minister at the time can sit back and say that he had no idea such things were going on, and senior officers should have complied with HASAWA. Those of us who have been subject to rear echelon efficiency experts know only too well how such scenarios can develop! I well remember a previous minor difficulty in the same general area, and in the same signal delivery that we were congratulated on the number of rounds we had fired in an intense twelve hour period without mechanical failures, we also were also taken to task for "not changing gun barrels after 500 rounds as required by Standing Order blah blah blah" Difficult to believe some 2,000 miles away, but unless you've been b******d about by Whitehall yourself, you really have no idea. Compare the number of politicians and senior officers who have ever been done for incompetence, negligence or dereliction of duty with the number of grunts with a gun who've faced similar charges. I'd better shut up now, lest you think I'm a moaning sod! Good luck to the boys of the Watch. Hope you manage to stay out of real danger, like officers with maps! Laurie
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 October 2004 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Daniel Stonehouse Its no good, i have to give my two pennys worth as well. As a serving member of the TA (working with ships, believe it or not), the amount of PPE I am required to wear when working on the docks is wide and comprehensive. As most people correctly state, if I were to come under enemy attack the high vis vest and hard hat would soon be removed and replaced with whatever weapon came to hand, in the last resort an sa80 (piece of c***).
Admin  
#15 Posted : 28 October 2004 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By alex mccreadie The PPE was probably in the same container as the Bullet proof vests that did not turn up.(Think about it????) But dont worry everyone in the MOD got their new chairs.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.