Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Thomas, Andrew
It seems to me that we need a 'best practice' notice board, where members can post examples of templates, procedures, presentations etc.
There are plenty of examples where members have requested such things and there are other places on the web you can visit but they tend to be promotional or restricted access.
We are all members, we all believe in the same thing and yet we have nowhere (centrally) to provide info and share examples of 'best practice'. Its not for profit it would a place where hopefully one task amongst the many is made that much easier for a colleague.
What do people think and how would we get it off the ground?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By fats van den raad
Yep, that would be ace. If one is concerned about general access such a board can be placed whithin the membership forum to limit acces to bona-fide members.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Kingman
I agree that this would be useful, it is an excellent idea.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Roger
Well Martin that means nothing will happen then.... RoSPA might though
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James M
Thomas,
I agree with forms and possibly presentations being posted but it makes me ask the question of competence if members are asking for risk assessments and method statements.
To me this comes across as the health and safety professional being unable to identify hazards, implement control measures or eliminate the risk.
This has come up on the forum regularly in the past where there has been members asking for what I class as the billy basics.
Would a member be liable if the information was used and found to be not factual or not suitable or insufficient?
There are a lot of good points but I believe that it will have to be well thought out with strict guidance and rules.
I am a firm believer of not reinventing the wheel if it doesn't have to be, but I also like the challenge and satisfaction of achievement when I have completed tasks using my own experience and knowledge
There needs to be a correct balance.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark B
I totally agree with James on this! also am I right in thinking that those who need this kind of help the most, are less experienced and may therefore not be members. So by having this as members only we may actually make the situation worse. Any thoughts?
Regards,
Mark.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mike Craven
I largely agree with James' comments and stand by the comments I made in the discussion thread titled "Possible" last week
Mike
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Website Content Co-ordinator
Morning Thomas,
With regards to your request for information on best practice. Have you been introduced to IRMA yet? We also have a technical information area of the site dedicated to providing guidance notes, position statements, journals and toolkits.
I hope this helps!
Kind regards,
Lou
www.iosh.co.uk/technical/riskmantoolkit.cfm (IRMA/risk management toolkit)
http://www.iosh.co.uk/index.cfm?go=technical.main (technical info pages)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert Paterson
I think that some comments are a bit harsh.
There are many people good at spotting hazards and risks but might not have the ability to present it in a manner acceptable to higher authorities.Templates are a way of helping those people.
Therefore such an idea of a centrally held place to be able to access information and templates is an excellent idea. I would not however be in agreement with restricting it to members only.
Kind Regards
Robert Paterson MIOSH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
Nice idea but..... wet blanket time
Most of us are employed under contracts of employment that specify ownership of intellectual capital is vested with our employers. That means any writing, invention, etc that we devise whilst at work belongs (quite rightly) to our employer. Giving it away for free is therefore likely to be in breach of our contract of employment. Most (many? some?) employers may turn a blind eye where one professional passes on some 'tit bit' to another, but I suspect eyebrows would be raised at the thought of wholesale large-scale copyright breach in the same way as music pirate download servers are being targetted by the music industry. I suggest extreme care will be needed if the idea goes anywhere.
And, sorry, but I don't think IOSH should be in the business of providing information for free that many of its members are making a living selling. Yes, I am a consultant, and I make my living by selling my intellectual capital. If my professional body starts giving it away, it is effectively taking the crust out of my mouth. (Note this isn't entirely self-interest - I made the same objection many years ago when IOSH services began selling training - thus reducing potential market share for many of its consultant / trainer members - and I made that objection before I became a consultant myself.
Plus, I share the concerns of others here that under-competent persons accessing freely available information may (wrongly) try to use it when that they are simply not equipped to understand or critically evaluate it.
And who is going to 'moderate' the postings? I wouldn't like to see IOSH hosting an information source giving access to the ideas recently touted here in relation to 'phone cleaning, for example.
Sorry again, nice idea in theory, but I don't think it will be legal, be right for the membership, or practical for IOSH to implement.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kim Sunley
Andrew (or is it Thomas?)
An excellent idea but as predicted and pre-empted by the previous responder - you are up against vested interests!
Shame, I thought we all had altruistic reasons for improving health and safety.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Thomas, Andrew
Kim,
It is Andrew.
I'm with you, I don't really care about 'vested interests' and I really find the thought of letting lesser experienced colleagues find there own way disturbing.
We all need a nudge in the right direction sometime.
I'm a RSP and I see it as part of my role is assist and advise, and would never not.
Like any idea there will be challenges to getting it implemented (we're all the experts in that)but I honestly believe that this should be a service provided by IOSH.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
sorry, I mentioned 'phone cleaning thread, when I meant to mention the 'first aid theft' thread... Or was that the 'new safety initiative' thread?
Apologies to the poster of the 'phone cleaning query.
And Kim. Yes, I wear a vest, but I wear it on the outside, where people can see it. I declared my interest in my response to this thread.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sean Fraser
I can understand and respect all points of view posted so far and to be honest, I'm not sure which colour I want to nail to the mast.
I can appreciate that consultants offer a service that can provide businesses with a start in H&S, but why are they REALLY taken on? To provide a framework involving a documented system, and then go? Or to provide value to the organisation either to assist in the implmentation, development and even running of the SMS or even as a speciailist in a particular field to help out with a specific matter?
If it is the latter, then there is little that putting some basic checklists and presentations is going to change. If it is the former, then it is obvious that the client hasn't a scooby and will be exposed in any case. Fact is, organisations often take on consultants because a) they need the intellectual capital is offers and/or 2) they haven't the time to do it themselves. So if time is an issue, will they really want to trawl the IOSH website (or others) and set up their own system? Probably not.
However, there is the danger that IOSH could be unwitingly prompting organisations to try and cover H&S "on the cheap" by simply downloading the stuff on offer and attemtping to use it without really understanding or appreciating the gravitas involved if it all goes pear shaped. We are a professional body that advocates the H&S is a professional subject and that organisations should always be seeking to have constant access to professional advice and expertise.
Remember though that more than 80% of our economic base is SMEs and in a comptetitive environment they often have neither time nor money to devote to this perceived peripheral issue. For this reason the HSE itself has a "starter kit" which at least informs - is the case that all we are proposing to do here is provide a range of tools to match?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Roger
Fair response that Sean - what does Thomas, Andrew think now?
Been and had a look at the IRMA and various other items on the Technical part of the website - I can't believe these cumbersome 'tools' will help the average SME who hasn't basically got a 'Danny' about H&S and struggles to even have a written policy.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Thomas, Andrew
My thoughts remain the same. The notice board would be for us, the members of IOSH. To share information, without promotions, without signing up to another web-forum.
I work on a COMAH site, I have major hazard issues and much as I think myself capable to write an inspection regime for warehouse racking, I don't want to. But if there is a member who has the information and would like to share it, great. Equally, if I can help a colleague at a SME who needs help with new legislation from left field i.e. DSEAR, no problem, I could post an example policy that would set them on the way. Assisted as you say with HSE guidance (that gets less useful each time they are issued).
That's where I'm coming from, we all help each other.
I've seen examples on this forum were people have asked for examples and got 'buy a book'as a response. I think we could all do more.
But the question remains where does the idea go from here?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ciaran McAleenan
Andrew
In response to your "where do we go from here?" I am assuming from your question and from the website co-ordinator's response that IOSH will not be taking you up on your request (at least not immediately). This request has appeared a couple of times over the years.
The first time it was made we responded directly and created a "Safety Exchange" on our web-site and over the years many of the contributors to this forum have posted their information there or made use of the material provided by others.
This venture is completely non-commercial so if you wish to use it please feel free to.
You can access it at;
http://www.web-safety.com/Exchange/index.htm
Best wishes
Ciaran
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Roger
Nice one Ciaran - I believe that is the professional response required - instead of reputations.
PS I thought that IOSH is the membership... nah! maybe not
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark B
Roger,
This is a discussion forum and therefore all about reputations.
regards,
Mark.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Got to remember that not all people who enter this site are H&S people, may get the wrong message from a 'written' piece rather than a verbal instruction, people can and will use the info for financial gain! I would! Intellectual property rights, copyright etc etc dodgy wicket to say the least.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Nagle
Andrew.
A very good idea, well done. It certainly would provide 'added value' for members.
To website coordinator:
Hope your not serious! Although there are some items in the technical database, they are more policy than practical and in reality they provide little of everyday practical assistance. Perhaps something that could be taken on-board and improved...
Regards...
Stuart Nagle
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
Just re-read this thread, and have changed my viewpoint in light of the other postings...
(I still have reservations about copyright, and potential abuse / misuse of postings, but:)
Rather than offering 'best practice' which is impossible to define (one mans meat being another mans poison) and requires extensive moderation, IOSH could host a forum for members posting items 'for peer review'. Any offering could then be downloaded and used / adapted as initally proposed in this thread, but the main intention would be to generate (constructive) comment from other members.
The peer review element would prove extremely useful for those in the early stages of their careers, and should also be helpful to those working 'in isolation' without the benefit of large safety teams to provide internal review of the documents etc produced. Because the postings will be 'for review', I think it may be possible to get round the copyright problems associated with posting 'intellectual property', and since the postings will likely be headed 'draft for development' I would hope the risk of misuse could be minimised.
The difficulty will be in assessing the value of any comments received - but thats always the way innit. Of course, there's always the question of who's got the time? but from the postings on this and other threads, it is clear that there are many very knowledgeable people out there who are willing to put time and effort into helping their fellow members.
[If the comments received are especially helpful, there might even be (gasps of astonishment?) an offer to pay for the time and assistance provided?. Perhaps we could even get into the habit of shareware - try it and, if you like it, pay for it later.... Just a thought.]
So, yes, a change of mind. The value of debate...
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi
Sometimes ideas appear to be good, but have we assessed what it takes should such a website area be made avialable in context of resources--including "peer reviewing" and co-ordinating it all? For example, the capaciy of the server and what is the mechanism for maximum time /size of items etc.
As a member, I feel that if IOSH were to have "information", for use by others as suggested on its website, it opens a complex set of issues.
In the future, it may be possible to have "practical information & guidance" on a whole range of topics, but it will require significant resourcing and co-ordination to produce & maintain/update it!
The CIPD website is a very good example of practical information available, either to all or some limited to members only.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Website Development Co-ordinator
Hi,
This has been an interesting thread with several suggestions coming out of the discussion. They have all been noted as it is something actively being considered once the review of IOSH Information Systems strategy is completed.
The topic will also be added to the Technical Affairs Committee agenda for debate at a forthcoming meeting.
Thanks to all of you,
Angela Wheatcroft
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.