Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 October 2004 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Paterson We have a workshop where we occasionally use thinners and paints. We consider this to be a possible fire/explosives risk. We are looking for a heater system to keep the guys warm in the winter but are having problems finding one that is safe to use in this environment. Any ideas?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 October 2004 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Tricky one that Bob, have you tried all possible means to minimise the potential for fumes yet under your COSHH Assessment? Generally speaking (& it depends on the solvent being used) if emissions are below the OES then they will also be below the lower explosion limit. What is the solvent you are using?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 October 2004 14:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Tonge Hi Bob, I suppose the first step would be to establish whether or not the thinner and paint vapours are present in explosive quantities in the workshop ie within the upper and lower explosive limits of the substances. This may require air monitoring and could lead to the workshop being zoned as per the ATEX directive and DSEAR. This may well be outside of what you are capable of in-house so see my recent posting regarding explosive atmosphere zoning for referrals for Companies which undertake this sort of work. Following on from this an intrinsically safe air exchange heater may be required but bear in mind this will be expensive. Ruffneck (a part of CCI Thermal Technologies) manufacture this sort of equipment - just put it in google. Alternatively some sort of artificial ventilation could be used to reduce the amount of vapour in the air to below the lower explosive limit in which case normal heating systems could potentially be used. This would also have the added benefit of reducing exposure to your workforce from isocyanates and other nasties which paints often contain. Hope this helps, just of the top of my head so apologies if i've missed something really obvious! Neil
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 October 2004 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Bob If people are working in the area without complaint (or falling over), the general concentration of solvent vapours will be well below the LEL. Occupational exposure limits are, at most, hundreds of ppm; LELs are usually measured in % (tens of thousands of ppm). As has been said already, you may need to review your COSHH assessments. Can the use of the thinners be restricted to an unheated area? If not, beware of partial decomposition of any vapours on very hot surfaces, such as heaters, as irritating compounds such as aldehydes can be produced. Paul
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 October 2004 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Is the problem because the thinners are being applied next to an existing heater or potential ignition source? If so, then there is a distinct possibility that a stray splash or concentrated localised vapours (as opposed to the general background levels of solvent) could be ignited. In which case, move the heater/ ignition source away from the work or move the work away from the potential ignition source as previously suggested.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.