Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 November 2004 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eric Burt Calm down, calm down........ It's a mneumonic I have come up with for remembering the 6 factors in the new HSE Stress Management Standards which were launched on Wednesday. Control Relationships Demands Change Support Role On a more serious note, it is interesting to see that the Standards do not specify the percentages that were quoted in the consultation document. Personally I think this is a much better approach as it gives employers more flexibility to set their own targets for improvement in each area. I see that the HSE web-site also has information about managing sickness absence. Surely this is more of a HR issue? Eric
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 November 2004 12:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Bennett Thanks for that, I was trying to come up with something yesterday (and failed!). Regarding the Sickness Absence bit I also wondered why it was suddenly of interest to the HSE. The cynic in me wonders if me will see some more "Management Standards" in the future. There is already so much guidance out there on this subject you wonder why they felt the need to chuck in their bit too. I would have thought that they were busy enough anyway without straying into pure HR matters.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 November 2004 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad It's actually quite easy for [reference removed] to get involved in absence management, as one of the first issues dealt with under this is "early return to work" and subsequently "light duties" As this requires assessment, the Human Remains people immediatly shout for the HSE bod as they try to shove the monkey onto his/her back. My answer to this was always "you find the job that you think is suitable, bring me the details and your justification, and I'll just tell you whether you're righ or wrong"
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 November 2004 13:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan The 'boundary' between HR and OSH is an artefact of large organisations. Most employers in the UK are too small to employ specialists in either. If you visit the CIPD 'Community Online', you may see why the HSE rightly link stress and absence management. HR folk lack awareness of the need for assessment of risks of stress on return to work after extended absence and tend to be obsessed with disciplinary compliance. As the DDA is relevant to physical and psychological fitness for work, it's a good idea for the HSE to flag up the need for more competent risk assessment after absence. Lawyers and solictors have A code of practice on negotiating claims against employers under para. 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules. I believe that a code of practice for psychological assessment of fitness for work could help to prevent matters getting into the expensive hands of lawyers and their timeconsuming procedures.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.