Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 December 2004 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julian Meer (work)
We are thinking of buying a post 1992 chemical filter press fourth hand. It was bespoke for the origanl owner. Its hydrualic pump and electric gear box motor are CE-marked. The currnet owner / refurbisher tells me he has "some paperwork" but can't tell me exactley what yet. PUWERwise I have some impact and entaglemnt issues and think I can see where a fixed guard went once. However, is my understanding of the Supply of Machinery regs correct in that "somewhere once" there should have been a "design risk assessment" outlining the hazards, their safeguarding and any residual risk? Given it is bespoke I doubt there is a relevent CE mark against an EN Standard that could have been awarded to it (some of its componenets aside). Hope this makes sense, i find PUWER a walk in the park compared to understanding the Supply of Machinery Regs.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 December 2004 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton
Julian,
You do not specify a date of manufacture other than post 1992; it could be that the equipment may be exempted from the requirements of the Supply of Machinery Regs if it was put into use prior to 31st December 1994 (providing it was compliant with UK H & S provisions at that time).

Another area for consideration is the fact that the equipment is fourth hand and notwithstanding the fact that it is currently being refurbished, it could well have been refurbished by the previous owners.

Dependant on the degree of refurbishment and the arrangements made with the party carrying out the most recent refurbishment, it could well be the case that this party is now placing the equipment on the European market for the first time and in such a case this organisation should be providing a CE mark and Declaration of Conformity.

In reply to your main question relating to the supply of documentation that could reasonably be expected (irrespective of bespoke manufacture), the equipment should have been provided with a Declaration of Conformity to the requirements of the Machinery Directive 89/392/EEC (Directive in force at that time) in addition the original manufacture should have put together a technical file which should have been retained by the manufacturer for a period of ten years.


Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.