Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 January 2005 16:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary Beckley - SHE Management (UK) Ltd Dear all.. I am writing an article entitled 'Control of Dangerous Substances' which should concentrate on offering assistance to a manager trying to comply with legislative requirements and offer practical advice. To this end, if any readers have any problems that they have overcome or any good, sound links to practical advice in the area of 'dangerous substances' (outside the norm), it would be appreciated. All comments used will be appropriately referenced. Kind regards Gary Beckley
Admin  
#2 Posted : 31 January 2005 11:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Gary your request is so general it is hard to respond. Are we talking about dealing with slight exposure to irritants or chronic or acute exposure to Carcinogens or Toxics? The obvious recommendation would be to do a "classical COSHH assessment" ie look at the Hazards of the materials, who is exposed, routes of exposure, Control measures, exposure measurement etc. Not sure that an article on it's own is enough?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 31 January 2005 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter ...or do you mean 'dangerous' in the DSEAR sense? Paul
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 January 2005 20:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary Beckley - SHE Management (UK) Ltd Thanks for your responses - in a word both. I am however, after practical solutions whereby practitioners have taken the basic 'COSHH' approach and developed it from what is fairly generalised to find a more specific solution that has reaped significant rewards. Primarily with regard to savings in cost, manpower, time etc. I am aware of the 'find a safer alternative' and ERICPD approaches but would be interested in actual risk based solutions whereby, for example, the benefits of keeping the 'more dangerous' (albeit more strictly controlled) substance worked out to be more beneficial. Also ideas that have simplified the COSHH risk assessment process such as using pictograms or software Thanks again Gary
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.