Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 January 2005 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By K Welborn Last weekend, we were operating a hired in 360 excavator to work alongside some of our own staff. An HSE Inspector observed a member of our staff riding on the excavator, everyone involved has admitted knowing they were wrong and most of last week has been spent reacting to the incident. At a meeting on Friday with the Excavator Company to discuss corrective action, they announced they had taken theirs - the excavator operator had been re-trained and re-assessed. He had spent the week at the Company's own training centre going over the CITB training Course. I am concerned that this has not addressed the real issue. No-one doubted his ability to dig holes and use his machine. What has been called in to question is both men's willingness to knowingly take risks and defy rules. But how do you re-assess that? What type of "re-training" can we undertake? Anyone else come across the same problem? Thanks K Welborn
Admin  
#2 Posted : 31 January 2005 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Aston Kevin You're right - this isn't a matter (for your staff) of knowing how to use an excavator, it's more of a general H&S awareness thing. I would brief all the staff involved (asuming you can't determine who was the culprit) about their responsibility for their own safety under HSWAct and MHSWRegs. You know your workforce best and can determine what will have most effect, but if it were me I would then go on to use some examples where employees have been injured through such carelessness and also some prosecutions under s7 HASAWA to drive home the point. It's also important to emphasise how seriously your company takes this kind of issue and to make sure they know that taking short cuts with safety for any reason is not condoned. Heather
Admin  
#3 Posted : 31 January 2005 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Totally agree with Heather - in fact there was a prosecution on such an event (JCB) in North Wales a few years ago. Foreman, driver and 3 labourers all prosecuted but Company itself was not. I may have the details if you send me an email address (richardaltoft@btconnect.com)I used the incident to raise an awareness. Of course worth adding those involved now have a criminal record and how will that look when they are applying for jobs especially if H&S offences related. In an ideal world it would be nice if "competent" people had to have a licence to hold certain positions such as supervisor, site manager, specialist driver etc and H&S offence would mean points on licence - get 12 and you are out!!!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 January 2005 15:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad I had an incident on site in similar vein. The MD reported to me that he da seen an operator in the warehouse riding on the forks of a reach truck. Bothe driver and the "rider" had just completed a RTITB refresher course in FLT driving three weeks prior to the incident. In this case it would be pointless to say "re-train and refresh" as the incident happened so soon after training. Both admitted that they knew what they did was wrong and both could state the risk involved in this operation. So you are right.. retraining isn't always the answer, as it will not tell them anything new. The problem is that they still choose to take the risk knowing of the potential outcome. In the case of these two, their flt licenses were suspended for two weeks, and because they had to use an flt in their normal duties, which they now couldn't, they had to be redeployed fortwo weeks. They ended up order picking and packing for the fortnight, including getting paid the lower hourly rate for order pickers. They have been model FLT drivers since!!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 31 January 2005 17:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Agree with Fats. Awareness is not a problem, this is a deliberate flouting of regulations and becomes a disciplinary matter Laurie
Admin  
#6 Posted : 31 January 2005 17:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Sometimes when wondering what to do in a safety situation especially one involving misbehaviour or management attitudes etc I reverse the problem and say "what would we do if this was a quality or production issue and sales or copmplaints or business image would be affected". The answer is then often clearer and would be that management would get tough and someone would get seriously disiplined or worse. Just a thought!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.