Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 March 2005 09:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen J Smith Hello everyone, I am in need of help. I have a chemical which has just been assigned as a cat 3 carcinogen. The substance, Methylene Chloride is used to weld polycarbonate. It is extracted to a high standard, the measured ppm at the work face is less than 2ppm - the old MEL was 100ppm. I have undertaken health surveillance - a pre and post shift sample being undertaken which shows very little exposure intake - in fact the local occ health don't think we need to do the tests. The chemical is locked in highly flammable cabinets, employees are trained in its use and spill eventualities. My question - is there anything else we should do or anything we need to do bearing in mind the cat 3 state?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 March 2005 10:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham It's been cat III for quite a while according to the data sheets I have. It's not actually highly flammable but keeping it in a cabinet is a good idea. It is very volatile though - main thing is to prevent spills. Kate
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 March 2005 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze At the risk of sounding stupid by stating the obvious... You could always engage your techincal staff or suppliers in looking for non carcinogenic alternatives. If you're that worried, it would be better to eliminate it from the process or substitute a far less hazardous alternative, than maintain the status quo and risk cancer in the users. Kate is right in stating that Methylene Chloride has been classified a carcinogen for a while.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 March 2005 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Pearson If the results are consistently low you can stop doing the measurements of exposure and instead monitor such things as extraction velocity which is easier but still demonstrates that control is working.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.