Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 17 March 2005 22:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Osborne I am disappointed Lawrence has not pointed out the potential impact on HSC/E's new strategy in his press release. The merger(s) will without doubt drag HSE back into public safety issues (an area they have been trying to hand over to others and the eventual merger with the Security Industry Authority will have profound consequences. I think a period of reflection is necessary before the structural changes can be welcomed and given the cost reduction backcloth in the Civil Service it is inevitable that inspection will be reduced and diluted. My own view is that the HSC/E leadership's welcoming of the mergers may have been premature and possibly as a result of a sense of relief in terms of what Hampton could have recommended about their continued. I am also increasingly worried about our institutions constant and unwavering support of HSC/E positions on such matters - we must have our own voice not constantly looking as though we are joined at the hip with the HSE. I cannot think of another professional body that does the same. Having said all of this I am delighted the tool of risk assessment has been firmly put on the map for all regulators and the HSE should get much credit for this for the development of this essential tool. I'd be interested in what other members think on these issues. Alan Osborne FIOSH
Admin  
#2 Posted : 17 March 2005 23:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CHRISTOPHER HAYWARD Sorry, but i have been working away this week. What new roles? Could someone post a link please? Many thanks (somewhat lazily) Chris
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 March 2005 10:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Osborne Link below to Hampton Review which is where all this has come from: http://www.hm-treasury.g...ts/bud_bud05_hampton.cfm Alan Osborne
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 March 2005 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lawrence Waterman The Press Rlease is posted on this site on the News Centre page, and read: Following the announcement in the Budget by the Chancellor Gordon Brown that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is to be expanded to take on an additional four inspectorate and regulatory functions, IOSH's (Institution of Occupational Safety and Health's) President, Lawrence Waterman commented: "The fact that the HSE has been accepted as one of the seven core regulators is effectively an endorsement of its role and work from the highest level. "There is logic to the HSE taking on the four extra inspectorate roles, but it will be necessary to ensure that adequate resources for the expanded role are provided. IOSH would be bitterly opposed to any move that took resources away from regulation in the workplace. "We also welcome the greater penalties that are being made available to the courts, and the new methods of administrative penalty and restitutive justice. For too many years, the penalties have not fitted the crime and we hope that the courts will make use of the new, tougher sentencing options now at their disposal." If I need to justify this statement - the announcement which identified HSE as one of the core regulators is welcome, but of course the changes mean HSE taking on new functions that were previously separate. Inspecting activity centres (introduced after the Lyme Bay tragedy) and Gangmaster Licensing (after Morecambe Bay) are about regulating matters of health and safety that combine public and workplace. There are always people who like to criticise but efficiency, reducing red tape and endorsing the importance of health and safety all form part of what has happened and I make no apology for welcoming it. My concern was that as this happens, we shall need to keep a close watch on the resources HSE has avilable to do its core job. Finally, anyone who thinks that IOSH is still slavishly supporting HSE is mistaken, and our statement went out before HSE itself responded - we think for ourselves!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.