Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney
Need some assistance ladies and gents, I am a H&S manager for a fairly large business park and have to deal with tenants sharing our main office block, I was amazed today to speak to the MD (one of our tenants) who runs the food and banqueting side of things in one of the buildings, I was assessing the correct extinguishers on site and noticed we were around 10 short of what we should have, (despite FRA by previous H&S manager) the MD stated that it made no difference his instructions to the staff in the kitchens was to ignore the fire fighting equipment and vacate the building!
When I queried his instructions he replied that he saw no law to suggest that his staff should attempt to fight a fire, or how many extinguishers are installed (despite being trained) I asked him if it was ok to burn down a 150,000 sq ft building from a chip pan fire, and he stated the insurance would pick up the tab!
Now I realise what the Regs state and the new ones for July, I was merely assessing that we had the correct amount of fire fighting equipment and that competent people were suitably trained, again, he shot me down in flames...(grrrrrr I hate puns) and again said that the extinguishers were for the fire brigade and not us.
Can I get some help to convince this guy, any suggestions folks?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Hallett
Hi Charley
If you wish to send me an email, I shall forward a copy of my SHP article of Fire Safety.
There really isn't sufficient space here to go into chapter and verse but the point of FRA's is to first minimise the potential for fire; then put effective controls in to minimise the consequences of a fire if it starts; and then ensure that ALL occupants can leave in safty without unnecessary exposure to the products of combustion.
Fire extinguishers should not be placed to attack fires but to enable people to pass a fire when they have no option.
Incidentally, the FB won't normally use your extinguishers, they don't trust anything that they don't test and maintain themselves!
Frank Hallett!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martyn Hendrie
I suspect that you and the MD are talking at cross purposes. I agree with Frank the purpose of the extinguisher is to provide person who may be trapped a means of suppressing a fire and escaping.
However, not wanting his staff to fight fires is no excuse for not providing the appropriate extinguishers that may afford a means of escape
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Higgins
A very high percentage (various figures are quoted usually between 50 and 80 percent) of businesses that experience a major fire never trade again, or cease trading within one year of re-opening? This should provide quite a strong incentive to extinguish a fire as soon as possible after it starts unless the boss is keen to wind up the business and take the insurance payout after the fire.
We would never compel anyone to use a fire extinguisher or to undergo fire extinguisher training if they did not want to, but most of our staff who are offered the opportunity to train are very keen and jump at the opportunity.
We never train staff to use extinguishers as a means to facilitate their escape from a building. We explain that extinguishers are there to extinguish the fire at an early stage to prevent loss of property (and perhaps jobs). Staff are taught to use an extinguisher to fight a fire only after they have secured their escape route so they can retreat safely if they are unsuccessful in putting it out.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Laurie
Just as a matter of interest, I was once seeking professional advice on a similar matter and I was advised, by my local Fire Prevention Officer, that there is, in fact, no statutory requirement for any undertaking to have any fire extinguishers at all!
I assume that there must be some some specialised areas where this does not apply, but I was totally gobsmacked to learn this!
Laurie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Higgins
No statutory requirement but it would be interesting to hear the response of building occupier’s insurer on being told that there were no fire extinguishers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martyn Hendrie
It would also be an interesting exercise trying to get a fire certificate.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Jackson
Fire certificalte's being a minimum standard just aren't PC in safety any more. All hail the great risk assessment God.
(Sorry, thought I was in the Working at Heights thread for a minute there..)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Aston
Fire Certificates are set to disappear for most premises soon under the Regulatory Reform Order. Then it really will be down to risk assessment.
Heather
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stephen D. Clarke
When I’m doing basic fire safety training I say to trainees that the organisation does not expect them to fight fire that is the job of the fire service. Buildings can be replaced but they can't can’t. Clearly if fire is blocking the means of escape then an extinguisher would be used. But generally I say they should only attempt to fight the fire if it is safe to do so, ensuring a means of escape to their rear. Any one of the following also being good reasons for not attempting to fight a fire:
You aren’t confident at fighting fire
You are on your own
You haven’t had fire extinguisher training
The fire is bigger than a waste paper bin
One extinguisher is not enough
Smoke is affecting your breathing
Gas cylinders or chemicals are involved
Your efforts are not reducing the size of the fire
I think Get out and Stay Out is the message.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney
Thanks for all your help and assistance, it is indeed an emotive subject!
Charley Farley-Trelawney
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Charlie Gunter
For those who advocate attacking fires with an extiguisher they might like to consider the following:
When a fire is reported to the fire brigade, a fire engine will arrive with four or five firefighters
If wholetime, they will have received more than three months full-time training
They will also reqularly train for several hours per week
They will be equipped with PPE including breathing apparatus
The fire engine will contain a lot of equipment and carry a large supply of water.
Whilst the employee is going for an extinguisher the fire will be growing.
Most extinguishers will fail to put out a waste bin on fire unless the operator has received substantial training (not just a quick squirt in the car park)
How competent is the average employee to tackle a fire?
The message is the old one. Get out. Stay out. Get the brigade out.
Regards
Charlie Gunter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
mmmmm quite an emotive subject this.
In a previous life I was the Station Officer of Red Watch Soho. This is the watch that lost their previous station officer at a fire at Kings Cross. Firefighters do put their lives on the line when necessary. My view on this subject is 'is it really necessary to allow a small fire to get out of control when a simple action may save a few lives let alone property and jobs'. Of course a large or rapidly growing fire should be left to the professionals, but the fact is most fires grow from very small ones and in the majority of cases most are dealt with without any fire brigade involvement. Common sense should be applied here. No one should be expected to risk their lives and firefighters should not have to be put in a position of risking their lives because someone could not take simple appropriate action. Perhaps if we were to think of that very small fire at home - would you really walk away from it and leave it to the fire brigade? I personally don't think so and I have probably been to more fires that have been put out by the occupants than most of the posters here.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Barry Cooper
In my last employment, we had a fairly serious fire on the night shift. When I arrived on the scene, three employees where being treated for smoke inhalation. The next day, I asked them what happen, and they said they started using a fire extinguisher, then another, then another; they eventually went through all nine fire extinguishers in the area, and then said, "if we had had one more we could have put it out".
They'd had a days training and during this they were always instructed not to put themselves at risk, and if one or two extinguishers didn't reduce the fire - Get out, Stay out.
Trouble is you give them basic training and they think they are firemen (sorry Fire persons)
Of course they did it for the right reasons, but...
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.