Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Eden
If a Parish Council look after an open area in trust for residents of the parish and they don't maintain it (except cutting of the grass) and they then claim it needs a tremendous amount of work to be carried out on it (the digging up of WWII beach defences (5ft concrete cubes), and then fill the holes with enert material offered by a contractor for nothing!) for safety reasons, and rent it out to various organisations in the mean time, are they in breech of HSWA sec 3 if they do nothing more than put up signs saying the surface is a danger by being uneven ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Aston
Mark
What type of organisations are they renting it out to?
As S3 HASAWA only applies to persons at work, it's not likely that they will be in breach of this particular section. However they could be in breach of their common law duty of care to persons using the area.
Does the question arise because someone has had an accident?
Heather
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stephen Boardman
Hi Mark,
as per previous response HASAWA is for work. However in the event of an accident I believe they would be liable under the occupiers liability act, signage is not adequate, it does not take into account the blind or partial sighted nor does it take into account people who cannot read English or cannot read at all. there have been many cases under occupiers liability. Not a definitive answer I know but with the limited information you have given it should guide you in the right direction.
Regards
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steven bentham
Section 3 - covers "other persons" affected by an employers work activities - this is not quite the same as the other two have advised you.
If this area is the Parish Councils work activities and other persons are affected it may therefore be covered under Section 3.
Someone injured through bad upkeep of land as you have described is unlikely to be a hot enforcement issue.
Section 3 also extends duties to self employed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jack
Re relevence of HASAWA, it depends on whether they are an employer. Some are. Some are not.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
They are also wise not to take up the contractors offer as they could then be open to charges of running an unlicensed tip!!!
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Aston
Re S3 HASAWA, note that the "other persons" who are covered by this also have to be at work. It's really intended to cover contractors and the self-employed who work on premises belonging to another employer.
S4 covers the duties of controllers of premises towards those who use the premises - this would include memebers of the public.
Heather
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Heather
Are you sure of that? My reading of L1 - A guide to HASAWA suggests otherwise. If you have the document, see para 41.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By George Wedgwood
My feeling on this would be to contact the District Council legal office and seek an opinion as many Parish Council obligations are obtuse and not easily interpreted directly through Statute as applicable to employers. As a former PC Chair, I was always aware that safety of the PC property was important and that the Parish Council had to have regular reports on condition and also budget for maintenance and any deterioration or vandanism aspects, so that the public could not be unreasonably compromised by any failing on the PCs part. When in doubt, get a Town or District engineerrs' report or legal advice before wasting PC money and then you can always request special assistance if it is seen to be a major issue - Districts have a little contingency to help Parishes in need. If in doubt - fence it off and post warning notices against entry due to unsafe conditions. Regards, George
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Aston
Paul
No! I am totally wrong and you are right. As penance I will make myself read Sections 3 and 4 of the HASAW Act in full and then write out 500 times "I will not quote legislation without looking it up first".
It is of course S4 that relates (among other things) to persons who use another person's premises as a place of work and S3 (as you said) which relates to persons other than employees - and includes members of the public.
Apologies for the confusion....
Heather
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Eden
Thank you for your help on this one but I think I have found the answer in the occupiers liability act, again may thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By russell calderwood
Colleagues
The following link to the Judges ruling on why Barrow BC [pleaded G to HSWA] was cleared of corporate manslaughter for the seven legionnaires' deaths, may be of interest.
http://www.nwemail.co.uk...ewarticle.aspx?id=203468
Note, it is reported that the architect [G of HSWA] will be facing a MS retrial.
Russell
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.