Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 April 2005 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Hammerton In the new WAH regs the heights for guard rails in schedule 2 are only stated for construction work. Does anyone know what this means for non construction work? Is the Workplace regs ACOP height still the standard or is it now 950 mm for everything? Thanks Adam
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 April 2005 15:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope If I wanted to know this I'd look in the schedule of revocations to the new regs...ps when you have looked can you tell the rest of us !
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 April 2005 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen Boardman Hi guys, for what it is worth I have just been on a day's WAHR course. The height of the top guard rail is 950mm for all. the reason for the change, so I am informed is that the average height of a person has increased therefore if this is true, then for a number of individuals the rail would be too low! you may have also noticed that there are no measurements mentioned for the height of toe boards was 150mm, now says suitable and sufficient. But! it also says that the gap between the toe board and the midrail and the gap between the midrail and the top rail must not exceed 470mm. so get your basic mathmatics hats on and you will find the minimum height of the toe board. nice of them to make it simple for us eh!! Regards Steve
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 April 2005 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Hammerton The shedule of revocations revokes only 13(1) to 13 (4) of the workplace regs. This leaves 13(5) in force (unless I missed an amendment somewhere) and therefore I would assume the 1100mm distance in the ACOP is still (at least partly) applicable. Does anyone know when/if we are likely to see some reasonable guidance?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 April 2005 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor Reg 13(5) is to do with installed fences to prevent falling into substances. The guidance here always was related to Building Regs standards and not temporary fencing in construction work - so this remains. Whenever fixed fencing is found necessary (eg by risk assessment) for protecting pedestrians from falls from height (rather than persons at work), I would expect Building Regs standards to be applied - but clear guidance would be welcomed.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.