IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
In battle of Hampstead, cold water brigade wins
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie
Quite a decision this...
This 'Independant Newspaper' story is worth reading, as it seems a line is beginning to be drawn in the sand regarding tolerability of risk, in a sort of "who's life is it anyway" manner.
My thoughts: I particularly liked the "government-sponsored cult of health and safety" comment. Real class. always wanted to join a cult!
Read it for yourself:
http://news.independent....n/story.jsp?story=633356
So, question is: As H&S professionals should we consider ourselves as having been put 'Back in our box', particularly those working in LAs?
Richie.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Böber
I think we are trapped in this dreadful void between what are genuine H&S issues - whatever we happen to consider these are - and those born out of obsessively pandering nanny state, which is more like a behavioural throw back to medieval superstitions. However, when one considers some of the more riskier nocturnal activities that take place in Hampstead, then a few people who want to half-drown themselves in the morning really aren’t all that much bother at all.
The only irony seems to be that this ‘cold water brigade’ can readily afford the expense of making a legal case out of it but are too tight to join the local indoor swimming pool.
Andrew Böber
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Nigel Hammond
I helped train and coach Hampstead Heath staff in risk assessment techniques back in 1998. However, I was not involved in this case.
All this stuff about Nanny state - often media reports get taken out of context.
I remember discussing this issue with staff. It was not about protecting the public - if they want to dive through a hole in an iced pond, that is their crazy hobby. However, the issue was about life guards being expected to dive in and rescue them in an emergency. At the time, we were not sure if it was acceptable to not provide life guards in these situations and this was being looked into.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
I think it's rather nice that we now have Cult status.
I found the following quote rather odd :
"Hampstead Heath Management Committee, said both sides must now go away and agree a declaration allowing for swimming to take place without contravening health and safety legislation. "We are in discussion with our lawyers regarding the wider ramifications of the decision for the provision of lifeguards throughout the day," she said"
a. She doesn't know what she is talking about, and b. She obviously has not read the judgement.
Ok, so they have been providing and will probably continue to provide (unrequired) lifeguards as a public service. Very good. But they do seem to be a bit half-hearted in that they appear unwilling to properly equip their employees for the job. Appropriate PPE for diving into icy water is easily available.
And I still think the swimmers are total lunatics (though I agree with the "nanny state" observation) I haven't even taken a cold shower since I left school !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Well Merv, people are always saying Risk Assessment is a Dark Art.
It's all beginning to make sense now.
That and the stange ritual we have at the beginning of the branch meetings. I think they call it "The Approval of the Minutes" or something.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
In battle of Hampstead, cold water brigade wins
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.