Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Liam Nolan
Hi,
I am stuck with a statistic.
I am calculating the seveity rate for my company but don't know what the answer units are in - is it hours, employee numbers or what?
the formula I have (from a text book - which does not make it clear what the answer is professed to represent) is as follows:
Total number of days lost - divided by - total number of man-hours worked. then the answer multiplied by 1000
Any help would be appriciated.
Liam
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Liam
If you have read your book correctly them I am afraid you might as well call the units orange-apples. The formula you provide is mixing units of time unless it is trying to give you the number of days lost per hour worked which seems a bit odd.
Severity to me is a measure of the average number of days lost per accident
ie total days lost/total accidents causing loss
You can also look at the median figure for time loss as a general measure of severity
Can you provide more information concerning your needs and no doubt some of the maths whizzes among us will be able to provide a formula.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Liam Nolan
Hi,
Ta for the response.
I am actually setting up a spreadsheet for tracking Safety data and have a text book with the formulas in it. All the usual formulas are in there - Incident Rate, Frequancy Rate, Mean Duration Rate and Duration Rate. Then we I have the Severity rate which has the following text after the afomentioned formula.
"This statistic is prefered by many specialists, who believe it is a better statistic for company accident trends between departments, organisations and industries."
It does not tell me what the 1000 (in the formula) is supposed to represent. Is it just an abratrary figure to get a managable number from the answer to days lost divided by manhours worked?
Is the answer just a comparrison figure not related to time or frequancy etc?
Regards,
Liam
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Ffitch
I am willing to be shot down in flames...BUT :
I think that this formula is giving you % lost time using the assumption that workers do a 10 hour day.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Martin
That could only work if the time units are both days or both hours.
I think the 1000 is simply a cut down of the famous 100,000 which tends to be not used always by some authors. The 100,000 hours used to refer to a working life time of the average underworked employee but now I am not so sure. Out of interest are the other formulae also using 1000?
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Ffitch
Yes - But that is where the assumption that the workers are doing a 10 hour day comes from.
No. of man hours worked / 10 = No. of Man days worked.
The formula then becomes a straightforward ratio between those days lost and those days worked.
Multiply the fraction by 100 and you have %.
I'm not trying to justify it - but that's my guess at how it's working!
M
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Liam Nolan
Hi,
The other formulas do NOT use 1000. they use 100,000 and 1,000,000.
I asked it before, is the 1000 just a multiplier to get a more managable number? eg 1 is better than 0.001.
Has anyone else got a referance book on safety statistics that could possibly shed some light on the matter?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kevin Walker
According to an Amercian Workers Compensation site::
In nearly all cases, time away from work drives the cost of losses more than any other determinant. This is why modified duty plays such a vital role in controlling costs. Therefore, the severity rate, which measures lost time, becomes the single best non-economic indicator of the overall effectiveness of a company’s workers’ compensation program. So, what is it, and how do we calculate it?
The severity rate is the number of days away from work due to workplace injury or illness per 100 full time employees (FTEs) per year. It sounds daunting, but the Department of Labor has made it easy to get and use this data.
To calculate your severity rate, divide the total number of days lost due to occupational injury or illness by the total number of hours worked by all employees. Following this, compare your severity rate with the average for your Standard Industrial Classification (SIC), published annually by the BLS. Remember, the average for your SIC is nothing more than the middle of the bell curve; it is neither good nor bad. You should set for your company a goal of maintaining a severity rate that is 50% less than your industry’s average.
there you go simple isn't it, still no wiser
kevin
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
But I still cannot comprehend the need to mix days and hours, but that is America for you! GB junior couldn't even match it.
What is interesting though is that it is a measure to be used over a long term - not simply an instantaneous read out of performance.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Barry Cooper
Liam
I work for a global company and the stats they use are as follows
Lost Time Injury frequency rate (LTIFR) No of lost time accidents per 200,000hrs =
No. lost time accidents in period x 200,000 / No of hours worked in period
Lost Time Injury Severity Rate (LTISR) No of lost hours per 200,000hrs =
Number of lost hours in period x 200,000 / No of hours worked in period
We also have Injury Index (II) = LTIFR x LTISR (which is just an index number)
We then report to the paper fed our accident rate =
No of reportable accidents x 1000 / Number of employees
This is the number of accident per 1000 employees
I the wonder what all this has to do with safety.
You are better off measuring the things you do to prevent accidents, as when you are measuring the above you have failed. Try measuring number of near misses, safety observations, audits etc per audit hour or similar
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.