Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary May
Waste Recycling Kerb Sides
Waste Managers have asked for advice on Kerb side collection of recycled materials. As we are aware this is the growth area within waste collection is a very steep learning curve for everyone. Not wanting to be bonkers-conkers on this – but still think we are running fast, rather than stepping back and using risk assessment.
Examples of recent questions
The men have to walk a distance from the property carrying a recycle material collection box. What is a reasonable distance for them to carry the box?
My initial thoughts are based on the manual handling training they have all undertaken to assess the load, the route and seek help – not able to mechanise this operation – Any more thoughts?
The men want to decant one box into another in order to carry a full box rather than a box with few items in. Can they do this?
My thoughts again are based on a dynamic risk assessment to assess the load and also the method of decanting the materials (plastic / glass) – issue of protective glasses (can be used later with conkers). All other PPE clothing, gloves – standard issue.
When at the vehicle which is a kerbsider sort vehicle the boxes are emptied and returned to the householder.
If any other safety professional working within the LA / Waste industry has an example of generic kerb side RA that can be shared it would be appreciated, however the cut and paste brigade – no thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Skipsey
Hi Gary
Having a knowledge (although limited) of waste collection within LA's you may want to indeed take a step back and look at the contributory factors.
You state that the men (presumably the waste collectors) want to increase manual handling load by filling boxes, why? I am making the assumption that this may be because, as in the cases with LA's that I am familiar with, that bonus schemes such as job and finish are being used by LA's in refuse collection divisions. This I would suggest may lead to a unproportianally high number of incidents such as manual handling, RTA etc.
My feeling's on this matter is that it is not the men who need trained but the LA's who have for many years (since CCT) imposed these working conditions.
Apologies in advance if I am incorrect in my assumption.
Regards
Dave Skipsey
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary May
Apology accepted -
Human factors are always taken into account as this LA is a well managed employer with a well trained and motivated workforce who want to learn - no job and finish anymore.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.