Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 August 2005 09:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts do you need banksman or riggers to use? or just the operator in the basket?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 August 2005 09:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MichaelM Jane Any reputable company that hires (or indeed sells) them will inform you of this and also you must ensure the people using them are trained and competent to do so. Hope this is of use. Michael
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 August 2005 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts I know the users have to be trained, however, I wasn't sure whether you would require a banksman like you would for a crain. Pretty sure you wouldn't as the person in the basket can see where they're driving themselves where as the crane driver can't see where he's driving the load, if you get what I mean.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 August 2005 10:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Good morning Jane. You cannot rely upon the plant provider telling you what you SSoW should be unless they have hired the plant c/w operator. As a basic rule of thumb, there should be a Banksman unless the RA categorically identies that one will not be required. In this respect, you need to ask several questions about the type of plant, how it's operated and the circumstances of operation. Essentially, if there's a problem, can the operator in the cradle always bring the cradle to a safe position [so that the occupants can step out in safety] without assistance? Also, is there the potential for unauthorised access and operation of the plant controls at ground level? Good luck Frank Hallett
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 August 2005 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Hi Frank, We don't really want to use a supply company, we have our own cherry picker and are in the middle of deciding whether we keep it. In order to keep it we need to train an individual to use it. Which is where my question comes in about whether we'd need a banksman. The cradle is only operated from within the basket, so once the user is in the basket, he decideds where to go. It's not planned that the user's vision will be restrited at any time, hence my question whether it is really necessary to have someone on the ground? If we do, then what kind of training would we be looking at for that person? Thanks, Jane
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 August 2005 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T No you don't need a Banksman. Banksman is a specific term and has been defined by precedent and requires a certain level of knowledge of hand signals etc (I'm not trying to teach my grandmother to suck eggs here I hope - if so apologies). You may need someone to watch for hazards but this would be decided by your risk assessment. In my experience this would be very rare. Cheers Rob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 August 2005 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just to be totally correct the term is Signaller and not Banksman in the British Standard and HSE are now finally using the term correctly because it has a more general application. There are times when a SSoW will require a signaller, this is normally in such places where there is restricted room and the driver cannot easily judge the space or when there is an interface say with the general public or other site traffic and you are controlling their movements as well. For simple operations the driver can assume control as the signaller for any lift work. Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 05 August 2005 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Oi, less of the gandmother;) I'm really not very 'up' on the subject, so don't worry about the eggs:) I realise it's probably on a risk basis, just wanted to check that there was no legal requirement.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 05 August 2005 14:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MichaelM Ah but Jane a risk basis is a legal requirement;)
Admin  
#10 Posted : 05 August 2005 22:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper Can someone explain why MEWP's are always parked with the basket up in the air. I believe it is to prevent unauthorised access, but most have duplicate controls on the chassis anyway. Just worries me that if the hydraulics catestrophically (probably spelt wrong) fail, the consequences could be serious, particularly if somone is underneath it.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 06 August 2005 01:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt Jane, If you decide to keep it, I suggest you use a company providing International Powered Access Federation (IPAF) approved courses. Worth a look at their web site http://www.ipaf.com. I can recommend a company I have previuosly used if required. Also noting some of the comments above; There is no direct requirement to have a 'signaller' 'banksman' or whatever the term you want to use for ordinary operations. It is usual to demarcate the area directly below the opeartional zone of the MEWP to prevent personnel from walking underneath. For dual operated MEWP's, for the controls in the basket to be used, the ground controls are locked out to prevent interference. Should the machine fail, then the hydraulic pressure can be relased under control either from the basket but more commonly from the lower controls. Note, such release does not operate whilst the machine is operating normally. If the MEWP is operating remotely then a ground person is recommended, more to offer assistance if a problem occurs.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 10 August 2005 13:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Again, thanks for the help, however, I since have some further questions.. 1) Can I assume it would be sensible to have at least two trained operators for a lifting operation? If you've got one in the basket controlling the operation and something happened then you would need to be able to bring the basket down safely. 2) LOLER talks about the person planning the lift and the person being lifted, is it normal for these people to be two separate people? and if so, would the planner need to have received training in operating the vehicle? 3) is it normal for people using cherry pickers to be trained in the use of harnesses or to have undergone some kind of rigging training? Or would this be dependent on the level of risk? Thanks in advance:)
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 August 2005 00:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt Jane, As always these things depend upon your risk assessment. If the person going up in the basket is the operator and if the MEWP is dual controlled, that being that the basket can be lowered from the lower control platform. Then it is advisable to have a second person who is trained in the operation of the MEWP, mainly to be able to lower the basket in an emergency should the MEWP configuration allow. Multi boom and reach MEWP's do not have this facility. The alternative is that the operator stays at ground level and sends the person to do the work up in the basket by using the lower controls. Consideration should be given to the operators filed of view, height the basket is to go, proximity of objects at that or lower heights which the basket would have to be manouvered around. If the MEWP is not dual controlled, that being there is no facility at the lower level to lower the basket, then you need to have an emergency plan to assist the person in the basket to reach ground level. It has been known for operators to go up in a MEWP basket in cold weather, the machine has become inoperable and it has taken upto 3 hours for someone to fix the machine, whilst the person in the basket remained at height and exposed to the cold weather. Your risk assessment should therefore take all of these factors into consideration. If there is a possibility of the person in the basket being stranded for any 'considerable' length of time then a means to bring the person down safely must be considered. There are a number of options ranging from relying on emergency services (check capapbility and call out time) to emergency self descending equipment which is attached to the persons harness and to a certified anchor point in the basket. The person then climbs out of the basket and is lowered to the ground at a fixed 'controlled' speed. The latter would require additional training, purchase of such type equipment, regular inspections of such and periodic refresher training. The use of harnesses in a MEWP will depend, once again upon the MEWP type. Scissor lifts 'generally' do not require persons to wear harnesses. NOTE: That a harness must be attached to a certified anchor point. There has been much debate as to whether this should be a fall arrest anchor or just for restraint. This comes down to the reasoning for wearing a harness, some shools of thought say it is to 'restrain' the operator in the basket i.e stop him climbing out. The opposing view being that if he wants to lean/climb out he will by disconnecting his harness. The second school of thought 'to which I am a 'proponent' is that the harness is for fall arrest purposes to stop the person hitting the surface should the basket tip. Whichever line is followed you must ensure that the anchor point in the basket is certified for the job. Previously many MEWP manufactirers would not do this. Also note that the harness and more importantly the lanyard (length and type) must be suitable for the height at which the MEWP is to operate. For example a 2m lanyard with a 1.9m person in the harness will in a worst case fall situation extend to the extent that the distance from the anchor point to the feet of the person in the harness will be up to 5.9m. This then brings me onto the next point that being if the basket does tip and if the operator does fall out, you then need to have a plan as to how you will recover the person to safety. Suspension trauma and exposure are the key issues here, both of which have been researched by myself and others. The possible affects of suspension trauma has many factors from the harness type, physiology and to much more for discussion in this posting. What is generally agreed, is that in the absolute 'worst case' scenario, a person could become unconscious within 4 minutes if left hanging. Yet another considertaion for your risk assessment. Finally without painting any more doom and gloom, the peron planning the lift can be the operator, who through training should be competent in this respect.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 August 2005 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Hi Derek, Thanks for your detailed response. I need to check whether this machine has dual controls or not. If it hasn't then it is acceptable to use the machine on this basis I assume? providing you have an action place in plan to deal with the person getting stuck or the controls failing etc? So to recap; If the machine has got dual controls are you saying it's preferable for the machine to be operated by a person on the ground? or again, this would depend on the location wishing to be accessed? Also, is it a requirement that the person in the bucket wears a harness? or is this also a risk assessed decision? i.e. if the activity is straightforward, does not involve any leaning out, and the risks are low, it would be acceptable for the user not to wear a harness?
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 August 2005 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Cook Could I suggest that if you only have one person operating the cherry picker from inside the basket, you cordon (barrier) off the working area to prevent any unauthorised access?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 11 August 2005 12:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts yeah, definitely good idea. I'm going to be recommending that as well as the person in the bucket a person, who is trained to use the chery picker, is also present. Otherwise, if you do have an incident or emergency and your operator is stuck in the bucket, so to speak, how are you then going to sort things out if you haven't anyone else trained?
Admin  
#17 Posted : 12 August 2005 00:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt Jane, If possible then operate from the ground. This is dependent on access to the work location. If straight up and down with no obstacles then no problem. Use of harness firstly depends on type of MEWP. I suggest you contact me with make/model of MEWP and I can advise further. In general if scissor lift no harness, if other, then harness required along with all other considerations previously cited.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 12 August 2005 08:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Innes Gray there is a reply. (I need to check whether this machine has dual controls). ? Dual control as in a car means that the other person can in some way control the Vechical at the same time as the driver press the brake. This cant be done on an MEWP i have seen. so the Dual bit cant apply you have upper control and lower control.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 12 August 2005 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Thanks Derek I will do. I apologive, i've obviously used the wrong terminology. By dual controls, I don't mean like in a learners car where they can be taken over by the instructor. I mean two sets of controls, one from the basket and a set of controls at ground level. The ground level controls being locked off when the machine is being operated from the bucket. Hope that's clearer.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 12 August 2005 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Jane I think things are becoming a little confusing. The only person moving the basket or equipment when in use MUST be the driver in the basket. The lower controls are for emergency release and lowering the basket when parked, or raising it for that matter, to prevent unauthorised access. The driving position is in the basket. All users must have an emergency plan for escape from high levels due to mechanical failure or if the worst happens and the operative is catapaulted or falls out and is suspended. Make sure this is clearly spelled out in the method statement/SSSoW. If you want a chat please feel free to email me. Bob
Admin  
#21 Posted : 12 August 2005 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts But this contradicts Derek's comment about if possible, operate from the ground? Or am I getting confused? If it is likely that the person on the ground will have better visibility than the person in the bucket, then wouldn't it be preferential for that person to operate?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 12 August 2005 12:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Jane The whole intention of the design of these pieces of equipment is for the driver to work in the basket and control all movement using the controls in the basket. A "dead mans" pedal or handle is provided at this location. This is an essential safety device in an emergency to cut operating power. It is not present in the lower control set as it is not intended that these are used except in an emergency or when the basket is empty. If you think about it the driver has a much clearer view of his position with respect to the work face and other obstructions etc. rather than the person below who will be subject to parallax and other errors. By all means have a person below if required but only to deal with situations such as emergencies, pedestrians and tight locations. Bob
Admin  
#23 Posted : 13 August 2005 01:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt To clarify my position once again on the issue of upper or lower controls. If it is a straight up and down with no obstacles including good line of sight and not excessively high, i.e a basic MEWP then the machine can be operated from the ground, that way if something happens to the basket you have a trained operator at ground level who can lower the basket. If other than that, per my previous, there are a number of considerations to take into account. . Jane, as previously suggested contact the International Powered Access Federation (IPAF) and they will clarify for you. Firstly though you need to gather all the relevent information on the MEWP you have and the work that is to be undertaken from it. Contact me direct if you want any further assistance.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 15 August 2005 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just to clarify my position - No person should operate the controls of a MEWP other than the driver; except in an emergency to lower it to the ground. Yes people must be competent to do this but it is never intended that a person at ground should control the movements of this equipment. I doubt that IPAF would suggest this as a normal operation mode. Bob
Admin  
#25 Posted : 15 August 2005 10:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Watts Ok, I think I get all views! Thanks for everyone's input on this, as usual, you've all been very helpful. Have some of your contact details and will be in touch when I know a bit more. Thanks, Jane
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.