Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 August 2005 12:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gavin Reeve My (construction industry) employer is considering making the wearing of gloves on all our projects mandatory at all times unless risk assessment shows them to increase risk. This is to reduce the level of minor hand injuries. Has anybody else got experience of this working in practice? I am concerned about knock-on effects such as skin problems and workforce unrest outweighing the safety improvements.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 09 August 2005 13:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert S Woods Carrilion insist on this and it looks as though the rest of the industry is going to have to adopt it as best practice. I would however like to see some data that shows that the wearing of gloves has had a significant impact on the number of injuries. Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 August 2005 13:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Clive Lowery Hi Gavin, I work for a ceiling/dry lining firm and we hve increasingly found over the last 18 months that the Principal Contractor is enforcing this along with glasses. Due to the nature of our work the operatives need dexterity of the fingers (getting screws from pouches etc). We have tried several glove types from fingerles kevlar to rigger gloves. We now use Perfect Fit Polymide Gloves supplied by Protec Direct. The part No is 2400251. The vast majority of our operatives are quite happy using these, although they only last about a week and are not so good in the wet. Its only the die hards who object and they would object in any case. If you speak to Protec Direct, I am sure they will be able to assist. Sales Rep is Steven Gregory 07740738839. Alternatively why dont you get hold of a manufacturer and ask for them to come to site and get your operatives involved in a trial of sorts. They are more likely to buy in to what they have reccommended. Regards Clive
Admin  
#4 Posted : 09 August 2005 13:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MichaelM As PPE should be the last resort, and not the first resort to sort the problems, should they not be examining why the accidents keep happening? Is it not a possibility that e.g. the task or process could be refined to reduce the likelyhood of accidents? Michael
Admin  
#5 Posted : 09 August 2005 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Richard Stokes Most of the large construction companies are now insisting on the wearing of gloves and some on glasses continuously on all sites. I don't have too much problem with gloves but glasses are resisted at all levels. I can simpathise with the employees on glasses although I myself wear them anyway(prescription safety glasses). There can be problems caused by operatives thinking that if they have glasses on then they don't need to bother with goggles for high impact risks. I believe eye protection & hand protection like any other PPE should be decided on by assessment and not by blanket site rules. I also agree that if you can involve the employees in the choosing of PPE you are more likely to succeed , although some will only accept Gucci gloves and aviator sunglasses! Colin
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.