Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter MacDonald
Just watched CATCFactory last night with the kids and some interesting points of safety management emerged as I was watching. Now, first of all I want to make clear that the four kids that fell foul of the factory fully deserved it but.....
Fat German should not have had easy access to river of chocolate and even then, where were the marshmallow floatation devices.
What safe system of work was in place to prevent unauthorised person being attacked, sorted and thrown in the garbage by squirrels.
No guards round the teleporter and no lock on lock off systen to prevent unauthorised use.
Failue to prevent the isolation of faulty chewing gum equipment leading to metamorphosis into giant blaeberry.
Oompa loomp PPE sadly lacking.
It's all very well teaching children a moral lesson but how much in compensation will WW get hit for in due course!
Pete
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
It is true that being thrown in the garbage by squirrels is one of the common hazards in Charity shop work. We have countered it by equipping the squirrels with small ID charrts which they can use to distinguish miscreant children from household debris.
One of the funniest threads I've read for a while; it made me larf!
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Mr Wonka would like to refute all charges as outlined.
As the factory is entered through a wormhole and is not in the UK or EU your H&S Acts/Regs and EU Directives are not binding by law and Mr Wonka says "H&S is really gross, H&S I hate the most"!
There is also no evidence that Wonka bars "as seen at a sweet shop near you" can cause anaphylactic shock (the nuts are carefully cleaned and proteins denatured) and teeth are not damaged.
In fact tests have shown re-growth of teeth in pensioners who were put in cages and fed a diet of Wonka bars for a year.
So there!
O Loompa
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison Melrose
Both the Police and the HSE are currently investigating the allegations and wish to interview the employees to gain their perspective to the accidents (which were not reported under RIDDOR or seem to have been placed in the accident book). An HSE inspector (who wishes to remain anonomous) indicated that Mr Wonka could be facing both a fine and compensations payouts as the building was clearly on UK land and Mr Wonka did not have diplomatic immunity under current UK law.
The local authority have recently been plagued with asylum seekers (who appear to to come from a large family of identical twins, quads or sextuplets under the name Loompa). Immigration officers now have the power to enter businesses to search for illegal immigrants and demand information to detect asylum fraud and have been called to Mr Wonka’s factory to investigate whether the Loopa family have entered the country legally. If they are found to have entered the UK illegally, Mr Wonka may be facing a custodial sentence as the maximum jail term for those convicted of harbouring or trafficking illegal immigrants ranges from six months to 14 years.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Please provide actual, factual proof that my factory is on UK!
As I said "H&S is really gross, H&S I hate the most".
W. Wonka
PS If anyone enters my factory without my explicit approval they will meet the same fate as Mike TV
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By stevehaigh
Sad!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Steven
Why are you so sad.
Have a Wonka bar (nut free so don't worry!) and sing an Oompa Loompa song to lift that sad heart.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Cartridge
Nice one Peter, However, I would be inclined to look closely Mr M Wonka's Health & Safety Policy, that is assuming he employs more that 5 Oompas.
It should clearly define the role of the Managing Oompa in relation to the H&S in the factory.
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Andrew
Would that be Mr W Wonka?
O Loompa
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison Melrose
I challenge the wormhole theory by attaching the proceeding of a workshop held on the subject which clearly indicate the worhmhole mouth would be "planet size" rather than factory size...
http://www.npl.washingto...1858913&CFTOKEN=66013003
While not denying they may exist, it is unlikey they would be stable and exist in the UK without the authorities having erected barb wire fence around them to prevent people disappearing off to exotic otherworlds where there a) may not be air to sustain life b) nice friendly locals who take kindly to "aliens" arriving on their factory doorstep...
I assume Mr Wonka pays taxes and is a citizen of the UK (and not an illegal immigrant himself). Is his company registered in the UK?
The Media interest in this story has led to MI5 / CIA and NASA taking a closer look at Mr Wonka's affairs.....
(and yes, it probably is a bit sad but taking oneself too seriously is even sadder!)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Alison
Like US, Willy Wonka and his factory are in fact on another planet thereby negating your theory with respect to worm holes.
Quantum Physics has in fact proven the existance of one such hole in the middle of my brain. This therefore explains why I am typing this.
"Worm Holes they shimmer most, Worm holes I like the most"
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison Melrose
mmm...
it wasn't me that brought up the theory of wormholes...you never said he was on another planet merely that the factory was reached by a wormhole. That article suggests that wormholes would have a massive opening (so is your head the size of a planet? scary if it is!! and I thought Oompas were tiny folk! ;)
Having not actually seen the JDepp film (I'm basing this on the Gene Wilder Wonka), at the end, the Glass Elevator can clearly be seen flying through the roof of the building and flying over UK airspace -over Charlies home and school (thus suggesting the building IS on UK soil and not as you suggest on another planet!)
also....given the high security alert the UK is currently under, his glass elevator may be shot down by scrambled fighter jets!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Alison
Sometimes I can hear a thought echoing around in my head so would say that there would be a big enough space for a wormhole.
Mr Wonka uses the TV Camera (as used on Mike TV) to shrink his planet to get through and then uses the de-shrinkafier to make it big again.
I forgot to mention that he travels from an alternative universe where safety is not taken as seriously as our own world where every employer takes immediate action on every bit of H&S legislation.
Like yourself, I have only seen the Wilder version although both of my boys have seen the Depp version and I feel as if I have seen it as they have told me so much.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alison Melrose
Fair enough...
(the Gene Wilder one was on the TV about a week ago and it was still as good as I remember it as a kid and there's also something unsettling about J Depp in that role! ). Watched a programme about the making of the new film though and it looks really good....could be a trip to the cinema this weekend I think!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Alison
If you go to see it, watch out for worm-holes! If you find any check to see if the new Work at Height Regs apply in case you fall into one.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Caro M
Haven't seen the new film but as I understand it there is only one Oompa Loompa. (Presumably the rest are clones? ) Does this mean Mr Wonka gets round his H&S issues by only actually having 1 employee?
Just a thought.....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Does this take us into Biological Safety?
Does a Biological Safety Officer need to be appointed and notification need to be made to the HSE for 1st use of class 2, 3 and 4 Biologicals, class 2, 3 and 4 GMO's and 1st use of Oompa Loompa clones?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By joedukeries
all you people that are saying this post is sad, are even more sad for saying its sad, health and safety is boring enough you guys need to lighten up like our mr peter mcdonald seems to have to, sometimes even health and safety guys can have laugh, err except for you guys in grey suits and grey lifes that call this post sad.
well done peter
keep em coming guys
joe
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Hallett
Surely the underlying message was all about teaching children the virtues of personal responsibility and that "groed-ups" can't be trusted to do it all for you?
Of course, as a spin-off we could also start a debate on the importance of being earnest and where Pink Floyds "Brick in the Wall" video would fit into these concepts.
Take that thought and match it against what we safety professionals try to inculcate into our various workforces.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MichaelM
Frank
Good point.
However...
Could it not also point out that no matter what we do there will always be companies/employers(such as the aforementioned Mr Wonka) who do not take responsibility and that there will always be people / employees / visitors / children who don't take responsibility for their actions and jump into rivers of chocolate because of greed stupidity and sheer lack of understanding of the risk etc.
Did Mr Wonka have a young persons risk assessment? If so did the parents read it and approve of it? I believe he did and they approved through sheer greed and the thought of getting their grubby hands on the Factory!
O Loompa
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.