Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 August 2005 04:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan has anyone out there come across a risk assessment for the continuous wearing of a safety harness and lanyard. Its effects on the body such as restricting blood flow, especially around the under carriage.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 August 2005 11:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper Hi John, If a harness is properly fitted and adjusted I wouldn't imagine that there would be any 'risk' significant enough to merit an assessment being carried out on the 'wearing' of it. The significant risk would be if the harness is 'called into action' and the unfortunate person is left suspended or in a position where the harness is under strain....the method for 'rescuing' the person should be included in the work activity assessment given that it is likely that each location may present different challenges to would be rescuers. FH
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 August 2005 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney John Continuous wearing of a harness would lead to much embarrassment and I would strongly advise anyone to avoid it at all costs! If you know of operatives that are continuously wearing harnesses you should try to discourage them, fashion among the younger generation is odd to say the least, and I just hope a harness does not catch on! Never tried this but for a S&S control measure to protect the 'under carriage' I am reliably informed that some 'UC' protection by way of an item worn by Cricketers may be of benefit if perchance someone were to go over the edge, this may prevent the 'UC' area from becoming detached from the .......... (I must have typed and re-typed this 10 times, and I just can't quite say what I mean) I can not vouch for the above recommendation, I have never tried it. Charles
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 August 2005 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope I think you are talking about boxes, which I believe have been abandoned due to hygiene problems - ask a cricketer.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 August 2005 00:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt Would agree, that if correctly, sized and adjusted then a risk assessment should not be required. Quite often it is not the harness that is the problem but the clothes that are worn underneath such a jeans. Also for note there are harnesses available on the market that use a special elasticated webbing to aid comfort. Reference wearing harnesses all of the time, this should be applauded if it eleviates the issue of persons working at height without a harness, so long as they attach it. Manufacturers some years ago picked up on the fashionability of harnesses and have tried to mimick the rock climbing industry in this regard. A personal study found that persons were more likely to wear a realatively 'fashionable' harness then a standard perceived dreary one. Brighter coloured harnesses also make our job easier as we can easily see whether someone at height has got one on.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.