Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Trim
The working at Height COP indicates that short-term inspection can be carried out without fall edge protection. What length of time would be considered as short term? I assume you would agree that a barrier would be required two meters in from the roof's edge?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Cr8r
Paul
Look at the HSE free leaflet - indg 284 - Working on Roofs. In this leaflet it defines short duration work as being minutes rather than hours and states that if its not reasonably practical to provide edge protection, anyone working closer than 2m to the edge of a flat roof should be wearing a harness. It doesn't mean that the edge protection should be 2m in, just that your not likely to fall over the side if you trip in the middle of say a 10m flat roof.
If you can't find the leaflet, I'll email you one.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Derek Holt
As the previous respondent has pointed out, if you stay more than 2m from the edge then not a problem. But an assessment must obviously be made of the roof itself, access and the weather on the day i.e. slippery, windy wet etc.
If work is required within 2m and a harness is to be used, then the system should be of a restraint type to stop the person from physically being able to fall off the edge.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Starbuck
Have the same problem. We have an assessment of weather etc before starting. Our method statement on the roof is always face the edge, always walk forwards. Use steel tape out from a chalk mark for last 2-3 m and then measure between marks.
We assessed biggest danger was at point of access - getting off ladder onto unproven surface. Also hidden fragile areas (felted over skylights!).
Saving grace is to inspect roof from access point. If it doesn't look sound to walk on a new roof needed anyway and thats the survey done.
If any of the checks are negative its a case of specialist access whatever it takes.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Derek Holt
As you point out there may be other dangers such as covered rooflights, that the building owners don't know about or neglect to tell you.
You raise a very good point about access. Besides the roof top adequacy to take a persons weight, time and time again I see fixed access ladders that finish at roof top height and have no guarding either side or inwards for at least 2m. The risk is greater when getting off such a ladder then walking on the roof top itself. If the surface of the roof is deemed suitable to take weight then there are ways around the issue of falling from the top of the ladder during egress. Firstly insist the ladder is replaced otherwise this involves the use of height safety equipment for protection. There are also good systems for work on the roof that offer good protection against falls.
On rooftops the first priority should be to prevent falls and not accept that a fall may occur and then to use fall protection equipment to limit the distance fallen. If such equipment is to be used it should be configured for restraint first and foremost and not fall arrest.
One thing to remember though, is that if general fall protection equipment is used and there is the potential for a person to fall through an element of fragile material that is not identified/demarcated then consideration also has to be given for what is potentially below the roof level. Although such equipment will if properly installed and used limit the distance of fall, there has been many cases were a person has fallen through only to hit another object below.
Out of interest do you include RF hazards from telecomm equipment in your roof top risk assessments?
If you need any advice on height safety then feel free to drop me a line.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.