Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 September 2005 21:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Singleton BSc Has anyone experience of dealing with electrical sub stations where the utility supply corporation has told the company who uses the electricity that the responsibility for maintenance of the sub station is jointly owned. I have a client using a sub station and Central Networks have informed my client that they are responsible for servicing and maintenance of the transformer section, whilst the switchgear remains the responsibility of Central Networks. Is this situation the norm for sub stations, and if so what maintenance and servicing is required; or where do I get information on this subject. I have looked at HSG230 and found that it was not very clear over roles and responsibilities. Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 September 2005 22:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Nigel. It would appear that there is a contract specifying who has responsibility for which. There are a range of possible causes and reasons for this situation as briefly outlined by yourself but rather more info is required to address the actual division of responsibility. If you would like to provide a little more background/history as to how this division came about, it would enable a clearer response to the problem. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 September 2005 17:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Cook Sounds like your client is being provided with a MV or HV supply, this is usually the case where the site load exceeds 1 MVA. Typical maintenance will include periodic inspection and sampling of cooling oil, integrity of connections etc. Switchgear, RMUs etc can be the responsibility of the client in larger installations. Opperatives will need specific HV / MV training, you`ll need to be aware of the possibility of PCPs etc being present in the oil of larger transformers.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 September 2005 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian Jones We have some experience of this at our company and the responsibility for managing the situation is determined by the "Ownership Schedule". That is, the owners of individual or combinations of plant items are detailed in the schedule. If you are the owner, hence you have responsibility for managing it, which will include maintenance etc. I think that these schedules were set up in the days of privatisation of the electricity industry, in the early 90's. Regards Brian
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 September 2005 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fred Pratley Nigel, Your client owns the transformer, and therefore periodic condition testing (a transformer supplier can advise on this)is advisable to ensure it does not fail (they can't be bought off the shelf). Assuming it sitting outside, then corrosion and weather protection are the other things to be checked on (oil leaks/ground pollution). If it has not been done, ensure the transformer oil is checked for PCBs as already mentioned. Fred
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 September 2005 13:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By R Joe As well as electrical plant and equipment, joint ownership issues can also include ownership of the substation building itself and its associated maintenance and security. Putting this aside, electrical utilities will own high voltage electrical plant and equipment including switchgear up to a specific ‘supply point’. Beyond this supply point, the customer will own electrical equipment that will supply the premises itself. The starting point is to identify where the supply point is and, therefore, who owns what, and for the customer to be clear about what their equipment consists of. Once ownership is clear, responsibility for maintenance follows, and the type of maintenance that is required can be clarified. In many situations, because customers do not have sufficient in-house expertise, they will contract specialists to maintain their equipment for them. Quite often the electrical utility will have an associated contracting company that specialises in this type of work. The key point, of course, is competence to carry out the maintenance. The current level of in-house competence and knowledge (including all available information about the equipment) needs to be established, possibly in conjunction with Central Networks as the respective maintenance requirements can then also be discussed. Whatever approach is taken, however, as well as demonstrable competence to do the work, the issue of effective procedures for liaison and joint control of danger is vital when work is carried out in the substation. Central Networks should have formal procedures for this, which is something else that should be discussed with them as well as the customer’s responsibilities in this regard. There have been a number of serious accidents where the two parties have not co-operated and co-ordinated effectively to control danger during maintenance work in substations. HSG230 does concentrate on the detail of maintenance and was clearly written by specialists, but the following extracts are relevant to the points I have made: Level of Competence Required - Some users may not have any 'authorised persons' on their staff and may have chosen to contract out all operational work and maintenance of their switchgear. As a result, there may be no one within the organization who understands the equipment, its safe operation or the need for maintenance. This should be treated as unacceptable and steps should be taken to remedy the situation. Overall Duty - It is the duty of all users of switchgear to provide management systems that will ensure safe operation and minimise the risk of injury. Such management systems should include the following: (a) policies and procedures covering the installation, commissioning, operation, maintenance and removal of the equipment; (b) an appropriate system of records; (c) definition of responsibilities and training requirements; (d) auditing of the effectiveness of procedures. Importance of Information - An important pre-requisite is to identify all switchgear in service and to ensure that up-to date records of network diagrams and configurations (including prospective fault level values at every relevant point on the system) are available. As a final thought, you can always talk to your nearest HSE specialist Electrical Inspector - hypothetically if necessary. Hope this helps.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.