Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 October 2005 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor I see that the HSE have again revised information sheet CIS 10 and seem to have left out the usual guidance about heights in relation to minimum base dimensions in the section about stability. Does anyone know the reason or think this a good move?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 October 2005 19:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope They abandoned this at the last revision before this one stating somewhere that you should follow manufacturers guidance. Nevertheless there are some benefits in rule of thumb - easily communicated and remembered.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 October 2005 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Daly In the UK they have traditionally lowered the centre of gravity of the tower by increasing the effective base width, hence the height to width ratio. On the continent they have always used kentledge at the base to lower the centre of gravity, hence the height to width ratio does not apply. This is something that will become more common in the UK. Take note of MEWP's for instance very narrow but good working height. Martin Daly
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 October 2005 08:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor This is revision 4, Chris. Revision 3 contained the guidance. It was always general guidance but subject to the manufacturer's instruction's. However, most towers around are not bottom-weighted and I am concerned that the guidance that's been around for years will be 'lost' and manufacturer's instructions will be unlikely to be found within reach of people erecting towers. What was wrong with the general guidance for those without benefit of manufacturer's instruction? I suspect that most employers and operatives would be hard pushed to come up with these and may well have not seen any such thing. For many a tower scaffold before erection is a pile of bits in the corner of the store or yard from which you select what you need at the time! Scissor lifts and the like come with the centre of gravity fixed - whereas a tower is what you make it at the time.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.