Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Derrick Robinson
Has anyone working in construction come across a metal decking system which is fitted between the steel beams. This is not the conventional type of decking which fits on the top surface of the beams, there is good published guidance for the instalation of that type, but there appears to be nothing for the type which fits between the beams. The accepted practice appears to be for the operatives to stand on the steel with no working platform and relying on harness and/or nets for fall arrest. Has anyone come across this situation? Did you allow it to continue? and if not what solution was found.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Derrick
I presume this is the British Steel decking which sits within an asymmetric section I beam, ie the bottom flange is wider than the top, Slimdeck I seem to recall is the brand name. The intention is to provide a much thinner floor slab than conventional systems and thus allow more storeys in a fixed height or a reduced height for the same number of storeys. If it isn't this do not read on!!
The first sections of this system are a pain particularly as they have to be laid in a particular sequence and I have seen situations where complete packs needed to be re-stacked at high level so that the sequencing can be maintained.
The method I have seen best used involves erecting the fixed handrails before erection commences. I also would want the decking to begin at low levels and work upwards through the building. The use of nets and harnesses seems to be about the only option. Cherry pickers have proved extremely difficult, if not impossible to use as access is needed above the sheet and the sheet has to be correctly located with a predetermined gap at each end. After the first sheet is in the problems begin to disappear. The HSE seemed satisfied with the work methods - the beam being around 500mm wide at the top flange.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Apologies
I am old and long in the tooth - It is of course Corus nowadays not British Steel.
The other advantage of this system is that you can achieve a 6 metre grid for construction which I think is one of the longest unsupported spans around. It provides some substantial savings in steel.
Bob
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.