Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 November 2005 17:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian As H&S professionals I hope you can help me with this. I'm curious to know what level of qualification and experience would be accepted from a legal point of view as being sufficient to advise and instruct an organisation on their H&S policies? At what point am I able to say "this individual is sufficently knowledgable for me to trust their advice and guidance?"
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 November 2005 17:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler All the law (HASAWA 74) reqires is a person who has attended a course, however as this web site is for safety professionals either Tech sp or MIOSH would be deemed competent.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 November 2005 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Brian Good question, particularly if you are considering employing someone. There is a definition in the MHSW Regs I believe, but without quoting verbatum I would suggest a competent person is someone who by virtue of their knowledge, experience and qualifications are competent. In other words - they know what they are doing. Ray
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 November 2005 21:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Like a great deal of other H&S issues, some of which are provided with extremely precise definitions yet are still apparently capable of an infinite range of interpretations; the word competence means all things to all people. When trying to explain it to others, I have found that, on occassion, it helps to approach this from the other direction - start by defining what it is that you do not understand, have no skill in or simply cannot do. What's left is what you're competent in! [Apologies to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for pararaphrasing the Sherlock Holmes principle of evidence]. I constantly amaze myself at how little I really know when compared to what can be known! Philosophy lecture circa 1965 - can't remember who it's accreditted to [something else I don't know]. Enjoy! Frank Hallett
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.