Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 February 2006 12:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Does anyone know of a proprietry piece of kit which could be used to fill in corners when scaffolds are erected around circular structures such as tanks or distillation columns? The norm appears to be that boards are clipped or nailed across corners in this situation. (The nailed boards then have to be shortened or scrapped so it is costly). Does anyone know of a better approach?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 February 2006 12:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Bellis Cup lock or similar system built scaffold will achieve this try a google search on cuplock and it will give you a few suppliers such as http://www.pcshd.com/pro...aSchemeID=10&ContentID=9 Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 February 2006 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh I should have clarified, we don't use system scaffolds, only conventional clip and tube fittings.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 March 2006 06:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus Gary, I dont think there is any other way to do this other than you have suggested. Cuplock certanly wont work, i have a lot of experience with it. Cost wise, if you have to cut boards, keep them to one side, for that specific scaffold. I presume its a maintenance contract. Therefore, the scaffold would be erected x No of times. If however, its a capital project, then include the price of the boards to be cut in the contract price.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 March 2006 23:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan When you say you only use traditional scaffolding... I can only presume towers are erected adjacent to each other and you are trying to fill the triangular gap that is created. If the scaffold is erected as a splayed independent scaffold ...the boards would `lap each other. You would be left with trip hazards to the working platform and suitable signage would be required or even a permit to work system.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 March 2006 23:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher John Signage or Permit would not be seen as control of the trip hazard. You might add chamfered wedges as a positive action to remove the step. Bill
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 March 2006 23:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan Quite right Bill, I forgot to mention that. In the main returned fleets of scaffold boards are left as they sit with a 38mm trip hazard. On any splayed scaffold the bridged boards are generally left this way, common practice. Cost, cost, cost.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 04 March 2006 23:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher Antony You say Cuplock won't work on the curve. Did you read the link given by Paul? I have seen Cuplock successfully used on the round. Gary I would suggest you speak with SGB or similar they will give you the facts. Bill
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 March 2006 23:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan Cuplok will work on curved,circular structures. As previously mentioned you will end up with bridged,lapped boards...which cannot be avoided.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.