Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 March 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SC Hi, I wondered if someone could answer me a general query with regard to h & s training? I am not a H & S professional but I do organise H & S & other training within our company. Up to this point all the training provided has been off site & with accredited / reputable suppliers, however; a colleague has been contacted by an organisation who profess to offer a 'one stop' solution for everything to do with health & safety from supply of health & safety consultancy (currently supplied by a large organisation who also advise on employment law, exporting etc.) through to the supply of things like PPE. Apparently this one stop service also includes training. Here is the rub, my colleague has been informed by this organisation that they can provide training such as the CCNSG passport to safety refreshers, electric hand truck training & various other courses in house (all well & good) but taking a far shorter amount of time than some of our eternal course suppliers & at rates which I don't feel are befitting the skill of the trainer & the level of the training. Therefore what I am interested to know is what you as professionals would consider a suitable length of time to deliver courses like those mentioned above & what sort of fees would you charge? (If the latter is not too personal a question.) Thankyou for your time. S
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 March 2006 17:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Tricky question. Depends a lot on the need for practical content and how much practice people need to acquire new skills. Typically, FLT training is done in one day. Theory in the morning, practical running the chicane is usually after lunch and maybe a beer or two. I used to run (15 years ago) a 3-day safety managment training session for senior plant management. Later realised that unless you are making them pay really large gobs of money for the training senior managers found it hard to cut out of their jobs for three whole days. Condensed the training to one day and found lots of clients. And still with good results. Nowadays find that managers can fairly easily take a day off for training. Half a day is even better. It's up to the trainer. How effectively can they get across the required material/motivation in the minimum of time available ? (ok, so you don't make as much money for half a day as you would for three days. But you get three times as many clients. And repeats) Suit yourself. You really MUST take into account the reluctance of a manager to do anything but his job. Training is secondary. Safety ? Come on, pelu-eese ! Keep it short, economical and effective. But I would say that, wouldn't I ? Merv
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 March 2006 18:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Crossland-Clarke Hi Also consider the course licences. IOSH, CCNSG, CIEH, etc all specify the length of time allocated to the teaching of these courses. If you are of any doubt, contact the licencing body and ask for learning hours then you can check this provider out - you can also check if they are direct providers of all these courses or if they are doing it through another company licence. AS a sub contractor they may not entirely be aware of the ramifications if they reduce tutor hours... Regards Linda
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 March 2006 22:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Don't know where you get your training for FLT from Merv. One day is only for refresher and exam of existing cert/licence holders. Novice is a minimum of 1 trainee :1 instructor :1 truck for a two and half days. up to Novice drivers 3 trainees :1 instructor :1 truck for five days and it's all go - no pub lunches allowed. Other comdinations vary depending on number of trainees. Hope that clarifies this one!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 March 2006 23:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK) Hi SC, I myself do not think you can specify a certain amount of time, which will make delegates proficient. Some people grasp a subject in no time, others have to take more time. A proportion of this is based on their individual learning style. Rather than a consultancy, I develop and deliver specific training courses... DEPENDENT on their needs. I will not deliver 'off the shelf' packages, as every organisation or company requires different training. I once attended a course many years ago at a company I worked for which was entitled 'An introduction to H & S'... Whilst there were many valid points, such as accident reporting, manual handling, etc. We spent an hour on FLT's! Great, other than the fact that the company was an office, with no FLT's!! When I questioned why we were doing this, the response was 'because it is in the handout'!! Ask yourself, in terms of training... 1). what do you want your people to achieve as a result of attending this training? 2). At what knowledge/skill/behaviour level are they at now?... You then simply have to bridge that gap. And if you don't know where you want them to be... How will you know that they have got there? In terms of sourcing a training provider, then find one that 1). Has the KNOWLEDGE that you require and 2). (Most important here!) Has the ability to impart that knowledge in such a way that the delegate can remember and apply it! Please feel free to contact me should you wish to further this conversation. As Bob Hoskins once said, 'It's good to talk'! Take care!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 29 March 2006 04:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman TBC your right. I was thinking of my last refresher. And no, I don't do FLT training myself. But you have confirmed my point. Course length depends a lot on the practical content and the needs of the participants. Merv
Admin  
#7 Posted : 29 March 2006 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Stewart Is this not one of those scenarios where if it looks too good to be true it probably is? Obviously the new 'providers' claims have triggered alarm bells, so I would look elsewhere. Look at the content you need for your course and see if there is an accredited body that provides it, fare more credence and greater ability to demonstrate competence in the necessary field.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.