Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 April 2006 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Perry As of October 2006 it becomes unlawful to discriminate against anyone based on their age. We currently have a young workers policy, which dictates that Young Workers (i.e. 16-17 year olds) will not be employed as technicians (most work 12 shifts, days and nights). Whilst this is in line with statute (WTD, HASAW, etc), it niggles that we could be picked up on it when advertising or refusing applications. Has anyone an amended Young Workers policy (including this change) that they would be willing to share, or any other advice or opinion? Regards Jim
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 April 2006 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Jim I believe that genuine safety considerations can validly justify discrimination in this kind of situation. Check with ACAS at this stage.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 April 2006 11:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man Agree with Kieran - you cannot allow someone to be exposed to unacceptable levels of risk in the name of preventing 'age discrimination' (same goes for race and disability).
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 April 2006 12:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi James 1st, please read MHSW Regs - Reg 19 and the associated ACoP. Remember that H&S takes precedence as it is criminal law and discrimination is civil law. 2nd, as necessary, get competent assistance to ensure that your Reg 19 RAs are suitable, fully supported by the young persons job description & job specification, and actually work as intended. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 April 2006 15:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Perry Thank you all, I appreciate the advice. Regards Jim
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 April 2006 17:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hilary Marchant James Don't forget to check with your EL insurers and the small print in the Employers Liability policy.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 April 2006 17:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Hi James, Plenty of case law world wide to confirm that you need to strike an appropriate balance between safety requirements and discrimination policies, particularly where the safety requirements are not spelled out in legislative print, i.e. are what you conclude from risk assessment as being apparently necessary. Regards, Peter
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 April 2006 20:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.