Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 April 2006 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker I know this has been discussed many times before but I'm feeling a little mischevious today I'm constantly reading comments regarding the quality of advisors with only General cert regardless of how much experience we have (12 years personnaly and I am currently studying for diploma) It peeves me a little when talking to graduates (0 Years experience) who come out with comments along the lines of "How do people with just the certificate get jobs like that?" Perhaps we Tech IOSH should start a revolution and form our own club. Rant over. Stab vest on. Take cover Andy
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 April 2006 14:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie It saddens me to see the amount of time/space taken up discussing qualifications and competence on this forum. In my opinion there is no "holy grail" single level of competence. Instead we should be competent to carry out our function at whatever level of an organisation (or technical ability)we operate at. Remember competence requires all three elements Knowledge; Training and Experience The exact mix depends on what you are doing and level of responsibility you have. Having managed a safety department in a previous existence I had a team, some of whom where MIOSH RSP (at that time) some were Tech SP and some were starting out in safety and studying for a qualification. I like to think that they were all competent to carry out the tasks expected of them. Martyn
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 April 2006 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Andy Yes I know it's sad - but this is Saturday and I'm taking a respite from setting up the now unfortunately necessary home CCTV system. The whole issue of "competence" tends to get very polarised very quickly as the middle ground of "acknowledged to be effective, can provide relevant academic qualifications and calls for help when necessary" doesn't look good enough on the CV for the majority of employers who believe that a specific [or any] academic qualification is essential! My CV is rather short on the formal academic qualifications [especially Degrees and the like] for a whole range of reasons; but I still achieved and maintain the CFIOSH grade totally independantly of any employer; & provide what my clients actually need rather than what they start out thinking they need. Moral of this little entry - if I can do it - so can anyone with the right approach There is room for academics whose only failing is lack of practical experience [like youth, the effect changes with age] in exactly the same way as there is room for the less academic but extremely practically experienced. They should be complementing [not complimenting] each others competence - not continually trying to compete - the world of work actually needs both! Did you like the alliteration in that last bit? Frank Hallett
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.