Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 May 2006 14:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Reading the HSE guidance and also the SG4:005 document I am puzzled as to under what circumstances you would use two separate lanyards and or one twin tailed lanyard. Some companies call this 100% fall protection. What do they actually mean?

The background is that we use two separate lanyards; for most of the time only 1 is used, you use 2 of them to traverse "hand over hand" when working on a scaffold without edge protection. A training company (which also supplies lanyards!) is telling me that we should be using twin tailed lanyards.

Does anyone have chapter and verse on this (PS any reply that uses the words "risk" and "Assessment" will be ignored).

Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 May 2006 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jerry Lucey
My understanding is that double lanyards are necessary where a person cannot move away from a point of danger before untying/ unclipping their fall arrest.

A good example of this is when scaffolders are erecting/ dismantling scaffolding where they need to move and in order to do so they need to unclip from a particular part of the scaffolding. In order to do so they will need to be clipped on elsewhere using another lanyard.

Roofers working on a roof may be able to move away from the point of danger i.e. to more than 2m from the roof edge before clipping off and therfore in such situations only one lanyard is needed.

I would have thought that in the majority of situations, scaffolders would require double lanyards when working in excess of 2m from ground level.

Hope this clarifies the situation a little.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 May 2006 15:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt
Gary

Also when traversing longitudinally along the build as the scaffold goes up you find yourself on the arc of a big pendulum so it is nice to clip off on a couple of outer uprights, that way if you fall you are less likely to tarzan off into a wall.

Jeff
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 May 2006 15:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
What difference does it make it does the same job, it may just cost slightly less than buying two lanyards.

get a second opinion from another training company Try http://www.narc.co.uk/
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 May 2006 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Thanks guys. Maybe I should have put it differently but my question relates to having two separate lanyards v one twin tailed lanyard. "Double Lanyards" is the term used for both arrangements by different publications.

Using the wrong aproach can render the lanyard ineffective and put the user in danger.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 May 2006 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liam Mc Conalogue
Guys,

Anyone in Northern Ireland able to point me in the direction of a scaffolding company that will actually use lanyards, because I feel like I am talking a foreign language when I put this to them as a safe system of work.

email: liammcconalogue@fastmail.fm to avoid any advertising
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 May 2006 06:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt
Gary,

To answer your question. The issue relates to the moment when both individual lanyards are attached at the same time during traverse/climbing. Should a fall occur at that precise moment then the energy absorber(s)will not deploy with the resulting forces being transposed to the person and of course anchor points. A double lanyard system has only one energy absorber and overcomes this problem. Please note that there are issues with regard how you use and carry such. Ensure that the 'leg' not being used is not clipped back onto the harness as this again can affect the operation of the energy absorber. Manufacturers have now 'designed' specilal redundany clips/attachments for this purpose that break under a small load. Otherwise just hang over shoulder without attaching. Hope this helps?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 04 May 2006 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett
Both types have value in specific circumstances and must be carefully selected and used only for those work circumstances.

Frank Hallett
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 May 2006 17:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David AB Thomas
For advice, refer to BS 8437: 2005, Clause 9.2, 'Fall arrest systems based on one or more energy absorbing lanyards'.

Also, be aware of the advice in an HSE Press Release, http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2004/e04168.htm
Admin  
#10 Posted : 04 May 2006 22:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan
Hello Garyh,
Double lanyards will be used in circumstances where a scaffolder cannot afford to be unclipped at any point,for instance, when erecting a temporary roof. Scaffolders may have to straddle the beams and crab their way along a beam to fix purlins, whilst carrying out this type of work they would be sitting on two inches of steel, no collective protection but minimising the risk of hitting the deck. This type of work can be eliminated by good planning from the offset. Suspension trauma is no good to anyone.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 05 May 2006 08:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Thanks for all the comments. I am still a tad confused - and I am not the only one!

I quote:- "Twin tailed or Y shaped lanyards must not be confused with lanyard systems which use two lanyards, each equipped with a shock absorber ("double lanyards")." Souce - HSE Press release E168:04 8 Dec 2004

Then:- "Certain scaffolding operations will require systems of work that use two energy absorbing lanyards or twin tailed lanyards, commonly reffered to as double lanyards" Source NASC SG4:05.

So HSE calls "double lanyards" a system of two separate lanyards; NASC refers to twin tailed lanyards as "double lanyards".

Or am I misreading?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 05 May 2006 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john houlihan
TWIN TAILED LANYARD.... A twin tailed energy absorbing lanyard should ideally be used with a common energy absorber, because two separate lanyards and energy absorbers may be less effective and increase the loads transferred into the body. When using only one of the double lanyards that shares a common energy absorber. Scaffolders should not wrap the spare lanyard around their body or attach it back to the harness or tool belt, as this could cause the energy absorbing lanyard to fail. The spare lanyard when not in use, should either be clipped onto the same anchor point, hang free or be clipped to a purpose sacrificial lanyard parking point on the harness
Admin  
#13 Posted : 05 May 2006 23:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David AB Thomas
BS 8437: 2005 states, in Clause 9.2.3 (Systems based on a twin-tailed energy absorbing lanyard) (NOTE This type of lanyard is sometimes referred to as a “Y-shaped” energy absorbing lanyard):

"To make climbing with two lanyards more efficient, a system can be used which incorporates two lanyards combined with a single energy absorber, to save weight and thus improve climbing ergonomics ... A twin-tailed energy absorbing lanyard comprises two lanyards each terminated at one end with a connector for attachment either to an anchor point or directly to a structure. The other end of each lanyard is attached to a single energy absorber in such a way that either lanyard can transmit a load to the energy absorber. The energy absorber is fitted with a connector for attachment to the user’s harness ...".
Admin  
#14 Posted : 06 May 2006 00:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Holt
John is absolutely correct, a near copy of my earlier posting. gary yes there is apparent confusion but the common terminology as used by manufactureres and users is basically:

Double lanyard: Two lanyards into a single energy absorber(forming a Y).
Twin lanyards: Two seperate single lanyards each with its own energy absrober
Admin  
#15 Posted : 19 July 2006 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Jones
Derek,

Sorry to contradict you, you might have missed Davids post above yours giving the definition of a twin tailed lanyard from BS 8437.

A "double lanyard" is when two single lanyards are used at the same time. For further guidance, see the free information sheet issued by the Work at Height Safety Assocation, which you can download from http://www.wahsa.co.uk/c...cat_view/gid,5/Itemid,8/

Keith Jones - heightec
Admin  
#16 Posted : 19 July 2006 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JayJay
Hiya gary

Can you please if possible e-mail me the info on SG4:005 ? My address is johnjo44@btinternet.com

Many Thanks
Admin  
#17 Posted : 19 July 2006 17:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By R Joe
Gary, a thought on this as it was originally posted in May. Could someone from the IOSH Construction Specialist Group maybe give a definitive steer, or if not, as they have high level contacts with the HSE, maybe they could get clarification from them, and share this with colleagues? Maybe the moderator will also pick this up and involve the Construction SG. This suggestion is not intend to pass the buck in any way, but to make maximum use of some of the options that IOSH has available to assist its members.

regards RJ
Admin  
#18 Posted : 19 July 2006 18:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Jones
If the quote above from SG04:05 is accurate (I don't have one to hand), then SG4:05 is mistaken and uses the terms "twin" and "double" loosely and incorrectly. Guidance in BS 8437 and the WAHSA guidance note is clear.

When using lanyards with two arms, they should be connected to the user via one energy absorber ONLY (e.g TWIN). If connected via 2 energy absorbers (e.g. DOUBLE), the impact force in the event of a fall could exceed the permitted 6KN if both lanyards are connected to an anchor point.

As pointed out above by DABT, special care must be taken when using TWIN tailed lanyards to avoid the "spare" arm being incorrectly clipped back to the harness of the user - which can (and has in the past) cause(d) the energy absorbing element to be by-passed, resulting in product failure.

Keith Jones
Admin  
#19 Posted : 15 August 2006 09:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus
Gary, I think everyone is getting a bit confused here. The idea, for scaffs, is that i. You're 'hooked' on to the ledger with one lanyard ii. when you come to the next standard (and double), while traversing, you 'hook on' with the second lanyard, on the other side of the standard before disconnecting the first lanyard. Therefore, you are 'hooked on' 100% of the time.

Couldn't be easier. I don't know why people look for 'hidden meanings ' in guidance when the obvious is the correct answer.

Tony Mc
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.