Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 May 2006 18:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH As the investigating officer (Either EHO or Company) you completed your RIDDOR report and have closed the investigation with 'no further action.' You get a letter from the injuried parties solicitor who requests a copy of your report. In the case of a private company the request should go via the company sec, in the case of LA's the request should be put through Boroughs Solicitors. Questions: 1. do you have to supply them with a copy of the report? 2. what advice would you give to either company sec or borough sol's? 3. what would happen if; in the case of a private prosecution, you have stated NFA, but the courts find the company guilty. All comments welcomed. Regards
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 May 2006 18:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi Johnathan, I stand to be corrected on this but as far as I'm aware, a "Statement of Relevant Fact" is all that can be asked for. This is due to others that might not want to be identified for whatever reason during the course of the investigation also having the right to privacy under the FoIA. Regards
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 May 2006 19:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Johnathon, Under the FOI act, the documents are disclosable by the LA! The DPA would not apply to protect the claimants private information as the claimant would be the one requesting the RIDDOR report. I suspect that the latter part of the question is confused; A private prosecution under the HSWA can only take place with the solicitor generals permission. So I presume that you mean a claim for damages; in which case there is no "guilty" finding, merely an award for damages if the defendant is held to have caused the injury as a breach of the common law or a statutory duty. Regards Adrian
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 May 2006 20:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Webber Hi, Is this covered by the Lord Woolf reforms that allow for a fastrack procedure, which imposes pre-action protocols with a strict timetable and penalties for non-compliance? In this persons are given 21 days to acknowledge receipt of a Letter of Claim from the third party's solicitors and then 3 months to investigate the claim, and decide if the claim is to be defended During the 3 months, relevant documentation must be provided such as accident report, risk assessments, inspection reports, details of health and safety training etc. Does this apply here? Richard
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 May 2006 21:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler CMIOSH This is an interesting question, asked by another LA, can the report and the findings of the RIDDOR investigation be requesed and used by the injuried persons/party's/claiment's solicitor? If yes does this therefore mean that in a private claim the investigating officer has to attend the hearing in a private claim case? Dont forget that the investigating officer MIGHT have to interviewed the injuired person etc under caution. Interesting point. Regards
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 May 2006 22:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi Johnathan, your last point is the reason why a "Statement of Relevant Fact" (SRF) is the only information that can be provided. The injured person would only be interviewed under caution if the Enforcement Officer was of the opinion he had committed an offence, in which case the solicitors acting on behalf of the injured person would be provided with that information after the (PACE) interview and upon completion of the investigation. Regards
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 May 2006 08:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man Is the injured person an employee of the local authority? Was the local authority implicated in the incident? If yes to either of these, treat as a claim and disclose under the Woolf protocol - if no to both, disclose under FoI (and I believe you can make a charge).
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 May 2006 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ITK Saracen's right, the solicitor only has the right to obtain a factual statement from an Enforcement Officer, (no hearsay/opinions/recommendations etc), of course if it was carried out under PACE this will then be disclosable evidence which the solicitor will receive anyway if there is to be proceedings.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.