Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 24 May 2006 21:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe Hi Guys, Can you help any advice welcome! A friend of mine had an accident whilst walking across a car park of a private school. The School had rented out both the car park and the school hall over the weekend for people to set up stalls (selling arts/crafts etc). Whilst returning to her car, her foot went down a pot hole causing her to go over on her ankle and damaging her trousers. The next day she contacted the school to report the accident and ask to be reimbursed for her trousers. She was told that they don’t record accidents that happen over the weekend!!! She was told any claims must be made against the people who rent the school who in turn sell the space to her to set up her stall!!! She was also told that the school was not responsible for the up keep/maintenance of their car park and that she parked there at her own risk... not signed or advertised as such!!! She returned to the school to take a photo but refused entry. I feel that the school are wrong on a number of things here guys, but i could be wrong! Any advice would be more then welcome... Cheers
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 May 2006 22:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie Karl, It is impossible to give a definate answer to your question without getting a lot more information and background. In the past I have always found a call/trip to the nearest Citizens Advice Bureau benificial. 1. They can go into more detail regarding the circumststances and 2. Often if they establish there may be a case to answer they can arrange a meeting with a solicitor (usually 1st meeting is free) Their number is in normally in yellow pages, etc. Hope this helps.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 May 2006 07:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe Thanks for that, but I am sure that they are bound to record the accident at the very least!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 May 2006 08:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh I think that the only course of action is to make a common law claim "suing for damages". No doubt the legal bods will correct me if I am wrong. I doubt the HSE or Local Env Health Inspector (they sometimes get involved in low level things where HSE doesn't) will be interested. The school will no doubt be refusing to accept any responsibility as they are setting a precedent and they may be afraid of an open ended committment - once you make any admission of liability you don't know where it will lead. The earlier suggestion of seeing a Solicitor (find one where first visit is free) is a good one. Then I suggest that you get a solicitor to write to the school, asking nicely for something specific (eg cost of damaged trousers etc). Finish up by adding the threat of legal action if no joy. In general terms though, who (especially in an organisational sense) admits liability / responsibility for anything nowadays, even if they know they are responsible?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 May 2006 08:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Karl, Under occupiers liability the owner of the 'premises' is responsible to ensure that it is in a safe condition and maintained in a safe condition so that it does not forseeably result in any person being injured whether they are invited onto the premises or enter illegally. Just becasue they have 'rented' it out does not negate their responsibilities, it could have been one of the 'rentees' (is that a word?) who could have been injured. If the tennents on site at the time were responsible for the pot hole then they could be liable however if it was there before then the school are the responsible party, they may say that they did not know or were planning to repair however this is no excuse. If they knew and did nothing or if they didnt know and were not maintaining their premises then they are at fault. Might be worthwhile speaking to the Dept of Ed at Council level
Admin  
#6 Posted : 25 May 2006 09:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Maggie Atterbury Hi Karl Dave Willson is absolutely correct. The school is definately responsible for the accident, which occured due to a fault with their premises. I suggest that your friend speaks to a solicitor if she wishes to make a claim - for the cost of a pair of trousers, a solicitors letter will probably be all that is needed.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 25 May 2006 18:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe Hi Guys thanks for your help..... I agree with the last two reply's, and thats what I thought!, However i just need to confirm in my own head... Karl
Admin  
#8 Posted : 25 May 2006 21:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jan Moore No question about it. The school is at fault and are responsible for the upkeep of their buildings and grounds. Be interesting to find out if the school even gave the rentees (probably not a word but sounds good!)any evacuation plans, first aid advice etc etc. I also suggest a no win no fee solicitor letter. A settlement would follow within days of receipt. They are not in a position to defend!!! Good luck Jan
Admin  
#9 Posted : 25 May 2006 23:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David J Bristow Karl Whilst I agree with the other respondents to your posting regarding who may be liable I cannot help but state that the cost of involving solicitors would far outway the costs of the trousers. Maybee a strogly worded letter would be the best option on this occasion - only my thoughts. Regards David B
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 May 2006 18:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe Thanks guys you have been really helpful! i think I will try a letter first then bring in the big boys if that doesnt work. Dont get me wrong, I think its a matter of principal now due to the fact that the school have been very unhelpful and very rude! Thanks again Karl
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 May 2006 21:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anwar Afzal You should try a letter before action, giving them 14days to respond informing them that you intend to pursue legal action if you don't recieve a satisfactory response. Following this, you can start proceedings in the local county court for a small claims action. you do not need a solicitor for this, as it is a simple form in triplicate, detailing your claim and amount up to a maximum of five thousand pounds. it does not cost that much and you can recieve your costs as part of your claim.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 May 2006 01:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill I wonder who will pay the bill for this? The School? The Education Authority? An insurance company maybe, or maybe the kids education fund? And we wonder why there is a blame culture. Good luck with the trousers. And loads of luck to the kids about to embark on thier examinations who require their education teams fullest attention!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 27 May 2006 07:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Denis Tighe Hi Im not a practiconer of law but I feel this may be worth some consideration. 1. Any court reasonably disposed would find that the primary duty of care existed on the owner / landlord having granted usage /access of their property to a tenant, public or others. (bear in mind the argument that, they having relented priviate primacy to public usage cannot exonerate themselves from the duty of care) 2.Did they having let the property out to public usage take such measures as to insure against the liabilities that existed ? 3. Whilst it could be argued that you also had a duty of care to identify and control that risk / hazard,it is secondary in my opinion in law to their primary duty of care to point it out to you. However: I would argue that natural justice lays down that the compuction on both parties therefore is perhaps a 50% agreement on the part of each to pay the cost of repair / replacement of the damaged item
Admin  
#14 Posted : 27 May 2006 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe TONY….. This is only being followed up for one reason only… “attitude”. Blame culture is getting out of hand I agree, however there are far too many companies out there who either don’t care about the welfare of staff, customers or visitors, let alone know the rules and regulations like every accident must be recorded regardless of fault if it happened on your premises. When my friend tried to record the accident she was met with an awful attitude from the school, who thought they could just brush it under the carpet. A nice letter, or even a small bunch of flowers would have been nice as an apology. After all, all schools are now run as a business and bearing in mind that this school is a private school renting its premises out at the weekends to gain extra funds. I feel very strongly, school or no school it is a business and a business that should follow all the legal obligations that every other business follows.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 28 May 2006 03:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill Karl, Had there been an injury I would have been inclined to be more sympathetic. However, this does not appear to be the case and the only damage was to a pair of trousers. Regardless of the status of the School the managers time will now be focused on something other than the kids going through examinations. As for the reporting and recording of accident as you are no doubt aware H&S legislation does not call for all accidents to be recorded (Social Security Legislation is not encompassed within the HSWA). The reporting requirements for H&S exist only in RIDDOR and these would not apply on two counts: Nature of the "accident" and the fact that the individual was not at work. There is, as far as I am aware no requirement to maintain records under the OLA. Enough time wasting goes on so best of luck with the trousers. Tony
Admin  
#16 Posted : 28 May 2006 03:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill Karl, Having read again your initial posting I notice she had a stall. Was she conducting her business? Has she completed her risk assessments? Had she exchanged information regarding risks etc etc etc. Are there insurance warranties in place protecting the school? Did she have adequate insurance placed for her by the people organising the event or had she placed it herself? See how management time can be eaten up!!
Admin  
#17 Posted : 28 May 2006 16:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe TONY She was injured, however only a cut/bruised knee. Oh and to point outone last thing here, It is not teaching staff who will deal with this complaint, it will be the Bursar! And regardless of who deals with this.... the school has a duty of care!!!!!! k
Admin  
#18 Posted : 28 May 2006 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Brunskill Karl, I agree, we all have a duty of care but we are not all required to record accidents. The School may well have been able to handle this differently but the fact remains that Managers (Not just the Bursa who the school has to pay for through fee income) will have to deal with the paperwork. The cost of any insurance claim is greater than the sums paid out in the claim eg 93 pence is paid in legal and admin costs for every £1 paid in the claim (See ABI). These cost have a negative effect on the premiums paid as a whole increasing costs that have to be made through increasing fees. Increasing fees mean that those parents on lesser incomes are precluded from putting their kids through a private education. And so the snowball grows. T
Admin  
#19 Posted : 29 May 2006 12:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster Hey, come on guys. Whilst the school is most likely responsible and at least should have apologised and offered to pay for their repair, a pair of trousers is hardly into insurance territory. Won't come anywhere near the policy excess, and I can't see that a stallholder would be wearing brand new high fashon duds! I can understand you being upset by their attitude, but if your concern is that they are allowing dangerous potholes to go unrepaired, to the possible injury of staff, pupils and other users then would a letter to the board of governors, pointing out their possible liability as "directors" bear more fruit?
Admin  
#20 Posted : 29 May 2006 23:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe John your right! Karl
Admin  
#21 Posted : 30 May 2006 07:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Paterson Have read most of the postings. I would have thought that Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, duty of care toward people not in your employment, would have applied in this instance. Correct me if I am wrong Regards Robert Paterson
Admin  
#22 Posted : 30 May 2006 10:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham Regardless if there was an injury or not, this should be recorded as a near miss, the school advised they they will not report something that happened at the weekend, so how does that management standard prevent a recurrence and better still an injury. The school is not being reasonable, I have seen some very nasty injuries due to potholes, (work in retail). Tony i see your point regarding the claim culture but they could make this go away very easily if the cooperate. Also was the pot hole noticed at anytime by the 'IP' if so she should have refused the stall if there was a concern but this doesn't take away from the fact that the car park was in an unsafe condition. If the school is concerned about future claims they should either not let the car park of get it in a safe condition. Putting up a notice stating that you use it under your own risk does not make them bullet proof, look and the Unfair contracts act, they can't exempt themselves from liability where they have been negligent, and in this case they have. If the school was not as stuff collared they this post would nat be here
Admin  
#23 Posted : 30 May 2006 22:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Denis Tighe SO WHAT DO YOU FEEL IS THE BEST WAY FORWARD KARL ? REGARDS D
Admin  
#24 Posted : 01 June 2006 08:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karl Newcombe Thanks guys, I have written a letter pointing out the fact that they do have a duty of care, lets wait and see.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 06 June 2006 07:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Two things: 1) contact the local education authority who most likely will responsible for the maintenance of the school and its infrastructure. this information may well be posted on the schools signage near the entrance. 2) they have a defence if they did not know the trip,slip/fall hazard was there, but would need to show that the area was regularly inspected to ensure it was safe. if this is not the case, e.g. they have no evidence of inspections, then their reliability on this defence may be floored.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 07 June 2006 23:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Cathy Ricketts As much as the school might not like it they have a duty of care to people not in their employment under HASAW, they have a duty under Occupiers Liability and they cannot exempt their liability for fatalities or personal injury so would suggest a cheap and easy option would be for them to pay for the trousers, repair their drive way and swallow hard and thank you for pointing out this problem to them before someone had a more serious injury. Alot of the time the problem is that school's and school bursars have such a huge responsibility it is not that they are trying to duck their duties but just that they are trying to keep their heads above a mire of legislation perhaps they need to consider professional H & S advice??
Admin  
#27 Posted : 08 June 2006 09:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech SP Some of the references in the following case may be of use note (17) McCondichie v Mains Medical Centre (2004) can be found at the bottom link and relates to a patient that feel and injured herself in a medical centre car park. http://www.bailii.org/cg...ery=donaldson&method=all http://www.bailii.org/cg...y=McCondichie&method=all
Admin  
#28 Posted : 08 June 2006 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Maggie Atterbury Hi Stuart Local Education Authorities are NOT responsable for the premises of private, independant, public or foundation schools, which are owned by Governors and Trusts. Maggie Atterbury Education Health and Safety Bath & North East Somerset Council
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.