Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AMJAD AL ATA
Hi all,
Just a for question:
Are there any world wide ongoing efforts to make a unique HS terms? AND to what extent it is important to make such unique terms?
My first study of OHS was US-based (Industrail Hygiene) & the second one was UK-based (NEBOSH-Cert)and before/after them (certificates) it was the internet as a source of OHS related information.
What I can say about, it is a great confusion for any one with no good OH background.
examples: JSA/JHA , QRA/PRA .. etc
Amjad
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Aidan Toner
Welcome to the world of H/S Amjad.Sadly I believe it is a reflection on our collective inability to mature and bond as a professional body that we dont recognise the importance of defining many of the working terms we glibly use in our working lives.We are happy to let OTHER professional bodies fix terminology to important concepts and work with those.If as a professional body we DO NOT ASCRIBE OUR meaning (ie for better or worse) to terms such as safety audits,sampling,inspections,working codes of pracice,safe systems,-then we cannot fully and easily discuss these safety issues amongst ourselves let alone the persons we seek to help and protect.
A simple example might be the word hygienist-You and I probobly have differing ideas as what these persons actually do BUT why should we not at least share a working H/S practioneeer's definition of that discipline?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AMJAD AL ATA
Aidan,
yes, I think sharing of difinitions is a step and also there may be many ideas that may lead to the goal (if taken by legislative governmental bodies - say EU - or professional bodies).
As I think, impact of such problem on OHS field & it is practitioners may be so bad.
It will be worse if no one care about or even try to move a step towards fixing it.
let me make a mini-test (For any mate who may read this post):
1- define accident?,
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Doe
The RoSPA one's a good one:
An unplanned, uncontrolled event which [could have] resulted in injury, damage or some other loss.
Thgis includes near-misses too.
The only thing I'd change is the title. From 'Definition of Accident' to 'Definition of Incident'.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Agree strongly. I was once caught out badly at a rospa conference at the Birmingham Exibition center. The title was "safety auditing" so I talked about internal, monthly management safety audits which, as a salaried Dupont consultant, was what I taught to our clients.
Other speakers were HSE, BSC, HASTAM RoSPA and ILCI. All of whom talked about their proprietary external audit systems : 5 star, umpteen points, a diploma and so on . As third speaker, after HSE and BSC and with slides already in the projection booth, you can't change a thing !
I was at the time an external auditor against the existing Dupont SMS (this was pre HSG-65, BS8800 or even HASAS 18000) But we had no points system, nor a diploma or certificate. And we didn't call it an "audit" Just an evaluation with the consultant's report and recommendations.
So I believe until this day, that some of the audience thought I was talking out of the side of my bum.
And, from that conference, Jim Tye still owes me a gin and tonic. I don't suppose I'll ever collect.
Merv
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.