Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MARK M
REQUIRING SOME BASIC QUESTIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE AUDITS, IF ANYONE CAN HELP, THANKS
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian Mitchell
Hiya Mark,
With the utmost respect intended, if you are carrying out the audit yourself, but need to ask for the basics, are you the right person to be carrying out the audit in the first instance??
Cheers, Ian M...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Pope
HSE used to do a list at one time, I think they stopped doing it. Old Timers might have a copy! If I were you I would get HSG150 which is about £13 from HSE books. It might take ten days unless you pay £5 carriage, but it is the basis for what standards you should be looking for, depending on what type of site.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
could also try and get a 5* BSC award while at it Mark!
Thought you may already have one of these if you look hard enough. or try CITB Manual
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Consultants!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Murphy
Mark
Try the Constructing Excellence web site (http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk//resources/az/view.jsp?id=523). The page I have directed you too explains what they provide but it covers health, safety and welfare (and more) providing a toolkit for self assesment.
Hope this is of help.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tim
Well done Dave;
Good to see somebody showing support for consultants. Although three cheers is customary not the four, represented by your exclamation marks.
Keep up the good work.
Tim
;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave McIness
David G.C.
I'm sure Dave W will be pleased with your link!
Not only is the page a direct rip-off from the HSE publication HSG150, it is also apparently sponsored by another firm of H&S Consultants - I wonder if the HSE know that their work is
1. having its copyright infringed in this way;
2. having its work 'sponsored' by a H&S consultant.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
As are the other materials linked from this site as if they were the copyright owners.
I do not know which is the greater concern, someone in construction asking for the checklists or consultants using other peoples sites without aknowledgement.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Bob,
probably fair comment, but a bit tricky all the same. I think I spend about half my working life in learning. This forum and others, site links, journals, chatting with others in the job. I have a library of files, forms and procedures given quite freely to me by H&S people over the years.
When, eventually it comes to putting all that into practice then the outcome is usually a synthesis of all that has gone before. Who or where I gleaned a specific bit of information is often impossible to tell. It's just there when you need it (objective of CPD after all)
So, if I need to work up a new construction audit check list, (haven't done construction audits for years) I will need to do a bit of research on legislation, acop, ssow etc, ask a few questions and confirm with my peers that I have got it right. Maybe half-a-dozen sources who I will not normally cite.
Is this plagiarism or deep research ?
I will freely admit that I am not a "construction person" More SMS and BBS. But I will contend that this does not exclude me from being "competent" in what I could offer to the construction industry.
And as I've got the welly-boots (with toe-caps), the hard hat and the hi-vis vest. I must be, at least visually, competent.
Discuss any or all of the above points.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Merv
When documents on the same site are in a variety of fonts the alarm bells begin to ring, especially so when they are in the identical fonts of the originating sites. I think there is the world of difference between good research and development of existing ideas and a straight copy and paste.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Copyright or Incompetent people? Mmm, what is the biggest concern? I'll have to sleep on that one! We always have to re-design risk assessment forms don't we, 'just so that they look a little bit different'... Re-inventing the wheel perhaps?
This profession is sounding more and more like politicians! Nit-picking about issues without getting out there at the sharp end, giving good, sound advice and making people and places safer!
Procrastination... the greatest evil?!!!
Take care!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Gary
Naw, just keeping out of the courts for intellectual rights infringement.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
See, Bob, that's good advice too!
Take care!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Would have thought an organisation with a BSC 5* rating would have these, or don't you think!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Bob,
your right. It's one of the subconscious things you sort of notice when auditing. Most people develop a personal style with preferred fonts, sizes, layouts and colours. Where something doesn't match you can ask a few questions to test depth of knowledge. And I don't think this is a trivial subject.
I know I spent a lot of the time in my early years in the job trying to present a good face to the annual auditors. Grabbing ideas and procedures from my colleagues and presenting them as "this is what we do here". Cheating at the time, maybe. But eventually that really became "what we do here" Must have worked. Well, actually, it did work. They made me one of the auditors. Oh, nostalgia. She ain't what she used to be. (look it up)
Merv
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.