Rank: Guest 
|
Posted By The toecap
Does anybody know of any prosecutions regarding the non reporting of exposure to asbestos as a dangerous occurence? And i have already looked on the HSE database to no avail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
No because its NOt Reportable per se but depends on how far you want to interpret the DO side of things
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By The toecap
If you look at RIDDOR paragraph 149 or 147 (depending upon the date of print) it states that it is.See attached.
149
(a)solid
(b)
The substances covered by this definition may be in any form: liquid,
(eg powder), gaseous or vapour and may include, for example:
substances which may be hazardous to health (eg asbestos, phosgene,
toluene diisocyanate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CRT
Off the top of my head, i dont know to any, i`m sure that you are more likely to get prosecuted for failing to comply with CAW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.