Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 July 2006 07:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel What are others doing re the 'wearing of hearing protection when working on the public highway re small/short term works with the general public present & the employers 'control' is not as it can be in a factory etc'- noting that wearing such protection can increase risk [note reg 11] NB: Already taken ambiant noise readings and many roads [under certain conditions] are above the minimum thresholds re the CNAW 2005
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 July 2006 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Moran Bob...personally I'd not like to see operatives wearing hearing protection to protect from street level ambient 'background' noise for the reason you give of an increased risk to their safety especially when in close proximity to road traffic. Around certain machines and tools... fair enough as has always been the case. Have utilised Peltor Lite Coms incorporating 2 way communication in the past but this would be an expensive option for this time of work.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 July 2006 09:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Bob You do not say whether you have taken spot noise readings or have measured a time-weighted average. If the former, have you calculated noise exposures from the readings and the likely exposure time? Does the noise exposure exceed 80dB(A) over 8 hours? Can you average noise exposure over a working week? Paul
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 July 2006 11:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel In all cases all types of noise assessments [even wearing personal dose meters etc]have been undertaken and in all cases [daily/ weekly dose levels] etc the noise levels are in excess of the control limits & rotation is not reasonably practicable
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 July 2006 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Bob If you are above the upper action limit you have no option but to provide the hearing protection whatever the other issues. This does mean however that you will have to modify the work methods to ensure that the loss of audio acuity does not increase other risks. Without such actions the HSE will see you as a soft target whenever they visit a site. I personally think the chapter 8 signing and guarding recommendations for short duration work will have to be modified, albeit outside the manual, I just hope clients will understand the increased timings and costs for the work!!! Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 July 2006 14:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus Bob, just give the operatives suitable ear protection, ensure they have somewhere to store it,tell them when they have to wear it, what to do if it gets damaged, make sure you have got a very simple RA, explain the RA to them and get them to sign to say they have been told about the RA and info on PPE and every now and then monitor the works and record findings, as long as you are being reasonable the HSE (from experiance) will just issue advice if any is required.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.