Rank: Guest
|
Posted By rmd
I have been asked to look at how much information goes into a FRA. I've found the usual check lists... 51 questions to ask etc, but I'd like to see how the document is layed out and if there is an industry standard format.
I think it highly likely my friend will engauge a competent person for this (no, I havn't done one before) but as it's for a fairly straightforward/new/small warehouse unit... he would like to do some of the donkey work himself.
Would be grateful for links to examples of completed FRAs. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Eden
If you go to the Dept for Community & Local Government and follow the fire resillience section, the guidance notes on your particular premises can be found - lo & behold you will find the format for a fire risk assessment from the powers that be. No seriously follow the guidance notes and you won't be far wrong. Mind you I think it is 145 pages long.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By rmd
Thanks Mark. I'll continue wading through the site to find an example. Anyone else have other ideas of where I can view completed FRA's?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie H
Hi, I have emailed you a copy of a FRA i have downloaded from Nottighamshire Fire Service. Hope it helps
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JAI
sent one direct
Jai
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
rmd there is no set format. Several brigades have examples, you have been sent a Nottinghamshire one, I believe if you look at the Merseyside fire servcie they have one too. BSI has also published a guidance document and recommended methodology called PAS 79. It costs £99, expensive if you've got to fork out for it but if your organisation already subscribes then you may not have to fork out.
Not everybody likes or agrees with the format promoted by BSI. The key thing I beleive is that whoever completes the assessment understands exactly what it is. The consequences of getting it wrong can be serious and as an ex-firefighter I am well aware who ends up risking themselves when it all goes wrong.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By rmd
Thanks for the files sent direct and for advice Shaun.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh
Hi, I had the same question only a few months ago. Please let me know your email address and I'll share some info with you.
Sheila
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Youel
Under the new FRA 2006 there are specific guides and expected standards re a number of industry types - you need to ensure that you have the appropriate guide for your work area
NB: Construction [as yet] is going to work to the older HSE guide
Point being is that 'one-size' may not 'fit-all' as far more info is now needed to undertake such a risk assessment
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Davis
After further digging, it transpires that the building in question is a multi-let complex of 9 industrial units. The landlord's responsibility (as far as he's aware) are the common areas such as the loading bay and corridors/fire escape routes between the units.
Would an FRA for "landlord only" areas differ from one for a single unit? I imagine the nature of the business' and the staff levels/types would have to be considered due to these people being the "end user" of the escapes in the event of a fire.
Two of you kindly offered to send me examples of FRA's which may have been diverted to a work e-mail... would be most gratful to receive these again. I realy guidance on HOW TO LAYOUT the FRA. ie will he need to start "Introduction" move onto "decription of premises"...."risks noted"...... "advice and control measures"...... "further work required".... "summary"????
As I said in my first post, I've not completed an FRA before, so need to be able to give clear guidance to my friend so he can get the "bones" of it together before having a competant person conduct the FRA.
I'm visiting the property tomorrow, so any help you can offer today would be appreciated.
Thanks once again.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
Just for your information I have seen an improvement notice today issued by a local authority fire brigade for a fire risk assessment which was considered not to be suitable and sufficient.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AJM
The thing i still cant believe people are mentioning is this suitable and sufficient assessment done by a competent person. I went to seminar with the fire brigade regarding the new regs and they said in their opinion (This has to be opinion as it has not been tested in law yet)but in the fire officers opinion the minimum that will be considered would be if the competent person had sat all 5 (3 week) modules of fire training coupled with experience.
In other words the minimum required would be what a fireman or retained fireman goes through in his training. I doubt many safety professionals have done this so i would think about this before doing your assessments.
I had ours completed through an outside company, of ex fireman by the way. I personally see it going the way of legionella and such where you have to get a specialist assessment completed.
Maybe i am over playing these new regs but its better to be safe than sorry.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
It would be nice to think that firefighters receive the kind of training you refer to but in reality they do not. That is the ordinary firefighter who sits on the back of an engine does not receive sufficient training to enable them to carry out a fire risk assessment of the more complex buildings. Unfortunately Joe Public puts too much faith in the ability of firefighters. The more highly trained firefighters, those who have studied fire safety and engineering in more depth and have spent some time in an enforcement role are better equipped.
I do not agree with the opinion of the fire officer you spoke to. Are you telling me that the newsagent on the corner has to have studied fire safety in depth before he can carry out an assessment of his shop?
As readers will already know, I am a strong advocate of persons carrying out a fire risk assessment to have an undertsanding of exactly what it is they are undertaking. There has to be a scale of complexity and as you move up the scale to more and more complex buildings then in my view there is a point when a professional fire safety consultant must be used. In my view there are too many people who do not recognise that point. That is precisely the reason that an improvement notice was issued.
How many readers of this forum have undertaken a risk assessment in a building which has a mix of sprinklers and smoke control. One of the reasons the improvement notice was issued was because the assessor had not considered the interaction between sprinklers and smoke control.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AJM
Yes I agree Shaun in reality I dont think the same level of competence will be required for a corner newsagent. My company is a Timber manufacturing company with 200 employees, thats why i had one done by a competent person.
And not forgetting of course even in a small corner newsagent shop no matter how small the assessment. I doubt most will of even had risk assessment training never mind fire safety training so where would their competency be, even at that level.
I Know big national companies who are still doing the assessments themselves. These are the people I think who need to beware.
My concern is i think these new fire reforms are far more serious than some people i have spoke to believe they are.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Monaghan
The following is an extract from the Department of Communities and Local Government Website (http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1162115).
"The guides are designed so that a responsible person, with limited formal training or experience, should be able to carry out a fire risk assessment. If you read the guide and decide you are unable to apply the guidance then you should seek expert advice.
More complex premises will probably need to be assessed by a person who has comprehensive training or experience in fire risk assessment. However these guides will be appropriate for more complex, multi-occupied buildings to address fire safety issues in individual occupancies."
As others have suggested the key is being able to identify your limitations and when to ask for expert help. It would be useful to know what the enforcers definition of "more complex premises".
One thing to bear in mind is that in most cases risk assessments are not being done from scratch - we are revising existing assessments done under the previous legislation.
Martin.
Martin.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.