Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie H
To set the scene i am in Saudi Arabia so the Road Traffic Act doesn't apply. However the safety of our employees is paramount and wherever possible i try use UK legislation as best practice.
Here is the issue, our company cars have very recently been changed to a new fleet. Amongst the new fleet of vehicles are Hyundai Accents without driver air bags.
Employees have now asked if a risk assessment can be carried out etc as they believe they are not safe to drive. I would like to know the legislation in UK or the Gulf if anyone aware and your thoughts / comments if you have come accross this issue previously. I have contacted ROSPA and am awaiting a return call but this is becoming rather urgent as you can imagine!
Cheers, Richie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jackdaw
I think the first question I would consider is do they really think the Hyundai Accent is unsafe to drive or do they just dislike the car - because it's rubbish?
I would think that as the car is manufactured to a standard, and if it is maintained in a roadworthy condition, then it is not unsafe to drive.
I also think that if you are going to look at your company car fleet then you should also consider other aspects of safe driving - are vehicles maintained, do drivers regularly check tyres, are drivers familiar with road traffic rules and customs in Saudi.
When considering the fleet you can compare the different models including safety features such as air bags, anti lock brakes, etc. You can even compare EuroNCap rating for the different models.
When complete you should be able to identify actions which you would recommend with regard to the operation of the fleet - maintenance, driver training, etc.
Your company can also decide whether it is willing to set a minimum standard for its car fleet - must have air bags, etc, etc.
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that you shouldn't consider the car in isolation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Clifton
Richie
As far as I am aware, there is no legal requiremnet for airbags to be installed (different with seat belts in new cars), they are an added safety measure that also helps to sell the vehicles. Just because airbags are not fitted doesn't make them unsafe (that is usually left to the people who drive them).
Try looking in the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 for confirmation.
Adrian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steven
Surely if the car was not safe to drive then it should not have been provided by Hyundai!
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brett Day
The car is clased as 'legally safe' as it has met all the requirements for type approval for the country it is purchased in, airbags, whilst mitigating the effects of an accident are not currently a legal requirement in either UK or Saudi. However the latest guidance from the HSE does recommend that employers when considering what fleet cars to but should consider safety equipment such as airbags and the like.
The car's crash rating can be found on the Euro NCAP site: http://www.euroncap.com/index.php .
The summary states: "The Accent earned two stars but the last star is flagged to indicate the unacceptably high risk of chest injury in the side impact. For this reason, the car would not meet the requirements of legislation commencing next October for new model types. The Accent's bumper performed exceptionally well in the pedestrian tests, however. All three test sites on its surface met the proposed legislative requirements."
Personally I would not want to be in this car in a crunch.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie H
Thanks, as i expected - why would hyundai make a car and a country allow import if its not legal! I do believe some part of the disgruntled employees issues do come from the fact that it is a hyundai accent and not something more up market - however i am dissappointed that a comany of our size cannot, as suggested have minimum requirements when obtaining new fleet vehicles. Shame the H&S department weren't consulted priot to contract agreement.... same old story i guess!
Thanks for your comments and you have all given me grounds to base my assessment on - we do already have good maintenance procedures etc for the vehicles so thats ok. Think althought it might not be the safest car in the fleet it remains roadworthy.... but as you said, dont think i will be rushing to have a drive - especially on this roads!
Cheers all, Richie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Glyn Atkinson
Based where you are, is it a safety question - scared of other road users' actions and need protection in case, or is it just a status question?
If you can properly define a safety need, then you have a valid argument, if it's to do with being one in front of the next employee, then you won't have an argument.
Isn't it funny that these types of questions will always be - "It's health and safety, isn't it?"
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Devlin
Your spot on Glyn, when people are looking for a window of opportunity they always seem to use H&S as there means.
I go with most of the other posters and would tell the persons involved that the car is perfectly safe and their only worry is the aesthetic quality of the car.
I tend to agree with them its an ugly beast but hey they'll have to get over their car snobbery.
Regards
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
There is a body of "expert" opinion that says that drivers "compensate" for added safety features by risk taking - the idea that not having airbags is unsafe is ridiculous. I admit though that this theory falls down a bit because of the behaviour of other drivers. However, defensive driving should be complulsory in company vehicles - better spend money on defensive driving training than on airbags? Bottom line though is probably that they don't like the car - having had an accent for a week as a loan car, I can understnd why.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Bower
Isn't the issue not about 'safer to drive' but 'safer to crash'?!!
Would/does the absence of what people now regard as standard safety equipment on cars modify drivers behaviour?
And don't forget, - the best safety device on cars would be an 8 inch steel spike on the steering wheel!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By BeSafe
Commiserations to anyone who gets offered a Hyundai as a company car. Time to start looking for a new job! No driver's airbag as standard on a 2006 model car? Sounds like something from the 80s when front headrests or rear windscreen wipers were optional extras!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Eric Taylor
I have no doubt a drivers air bag is available as an extra cost option. You could silence the complainers by approaching the hyundai dealership and requesting the vehicles be fitted with air bags at their first service?
I'm sure the silence will be stunning
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie H
Many of you are correct this may be a status issue with a certain employee however the Manager fighting his corner is purely using the safety issue for the argument, and we have approx 20 of these on the road. We also provide Ford Focus' which have 5 star Ncap ratings, shame we didnt provide more of those hey. Unable to ascertain where these cars were produced as Hyundai say that all Accents have dual airbags - not here they dont!!
Think the issue boils down to our company not having a purchasing policy on new fleet vehicles ensuring minimum safety requirements - e.g. air bags, 3 point seat belts etc... and the purchaser not been competent to complete the contract.
I do believe we must consider the safety of our employees and in my humble opinion that means replacing these accents with a safer vehicle, yes with airbags! Statistics apparently prove will save 13% more fatal / major injuries if used in conjuction with seat belt than a seat belt alone....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philby'
Eric,
airbags can rarely be retrofitted...without some dudicious wiring, sensors and other associated bits and pieces...they usually have ECU's and may be linked to other safety items like seat belt pretensionors, fuel cut offs and the obligatory warning light on the dash!
As for the original question, I tend to agree with previous posts that the drivers moans are more about status than safety.
No I wouldn't have a Hyundai either, but then again I wouldnt have a beemer, ford or gm product...I know what I like and I'll buy my own thanks....
Presumably the drivers have a 'company car opt out for money option'...tell them to use it or lose it!
Philby'
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brett Day
Richie, I don't envy you. It's going to be a hard argument explaining why some employees/departments have vehicles with high safety scores and others have a poor rating. I think your approach of getting a coherant policy on vehicle purchase with regards safety spec is spot on.
Would also agree with the previous poster regards retro fitting airbags. Where airbags are an optional extra these are normally 'factory fit' options that are put in during the assembly of the vehicle, they are not a dealer fit option and assuming they were I would expect it to be a very expensive exercise.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.