Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 July 2006 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Harry Cowling I work for an Osteopathic Clinic in London. I have been advised by our practice manager that mirrors for use in clinical practice rooms should be acrylic rather than glass. These mirrors will be attached to the wall and will be three-quarter length, principally to aid patient when dressing after treatment. Can anyone advise whether this is indeed the case?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 July 2006 22:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi Harry, on reflection, what difference would the type of material make in terms of the desired effect? Is this a H&S question? Regards
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 July 2006 16:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster Not so quick to scoff, Saracen :-). May be thinking of the need for healthcare premises to provide beds for those at risk of suicide, in which case any area where a suicidal patient could be alone has to be carefully planned - acrylic mirrors, jugs, tumblers etc, lack of ligature attachment points, and the like. Would also be a consideration in areas where there is risk of people breaking things to use as weapons. Otherwise, any fixed glass which extends to within a certain distance of the ground (sorry, can't recall the figure but it is somewhere about 1m) must be toughened or laminated and "kitemarked", or could be acrylic or polished metal instead. I would imagine that full-length glass mirrors now sold would be of that standard anyway, and therefore safe from both deliberate and accidental breakage, but you would need to check.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 July 2006 16:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Agree with John, examine toughened or laminated alternatives. The height above ground is 80cm so a metre isn't so far off, the pane laso has to be more than 25 cm wide. However, that will just provide compliance with regs, if there is a risk of self harm or using shards of glass as a weapon then you'd want all glazing to be hard to break, John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 July 2006 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Westrupp harry I am fairly sure you also need to make sure that mirrors, like everything else in the room, can be easily and thoroughly disinfected to prevent infection control risks. Linda
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 July 2006 19:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi Harry/John, apologies for the play on words guys. I think the hot weather must have had an effect on me... of course you are right to consider the points you have raised... good luck in sorting this out Harry Kind regards
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 July 2006 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Harry Cowling Thanks for your comments everyone. Some useful feedback there.....
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 July 2006 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By carl burgess May I suggest stainless steel mirrors? They have the look of glass but are vandal-proof and virtually indestructable. Even acrylic will shatter and create shards. Polycarbonate will melt and discolour with a lighter or match. We manufacture stainless steel mirrors for institutions and public areas. Also for stabled horses! Carl Burgess www.companionmirrors.co.uk
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.