Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 July 2006 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Eyup folks, Hot and sultry in East Yorkshire; the weather, not me. I've just downloaded the brand new guide to FRA in Residential Premises, and like a fool I've started raeding it. I knew it would only cause grief, and it has, and I'm only 2 pages into Part 2 (the important bit). What's causing the problem is this re kitchens; 'In larger premises with extensive catering facilities the cooking range should have some form of automatic fire suppression system'. Very large premises are defined as having over 60 residents; but what does anybody think is meant by 'larger premises' and 'extensive catering facilities'; answers on a postcard, or preferably this website, please, John
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 July 2006 13:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Why not turn it on it's head and ask the Q of your local Fire authority or HSE office ?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 July 2006 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood Sounds to me like you have to define what you think attracts risk! My view would probably be something like - over 5 employees on the premises - extensive or large (i.e a Policy etc. required, and specific procedures for minimising the risks identified. Lets say if you had three different people cooking on the range, with different methods and all rushed off their feet - would you not consider some form of automatic extinguishment system in casea pan was left on heat inadvertently? The other aspects would be how quickly could occupants be evacuated in case of fire and what alarms are in place, would work and could be heard by all. Anyway, that would be the sort of thinking I would do to try and scope out the size of the problem, rather than try to look for specifics in terms of prescriptive regulation.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 July 2006 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight George, I agree with the logic of your approach; the problem is that its that old chestnut 'best practice' again; still, we could look at it in the way you suggest as that would probably help. Ali, Not a bad idea, and its probably what I'll end up doing, I was just hoping that maybe one of the contributors to this board might have had such a steer already or have a bit of inside knowledge as to what was in the minds of the people who put the guide together, John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 August 2006 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood Under the RR(FS)O the fire authority will not be able to give you advise (so get in quick before October 1st). In my professional opinion, if they are cooking using fryers or other high risk item then regardless of the number of residents, the fryer should be fitted with a suppression system. I always look at two types either foam or high pressure water fog. Water fog is effective and cools the oil and the kitchen can be up and back in action immediately but it is costly. Foam is messy and does not cool the oil. The equipment needs to be deep cleaned before use. I have recommended several companies for these as a consultant, e-mail me if you wish? Ashley
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.