Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Les Fullwood
Has anybody had any experience of conducting audiiometric testing in a call centre environment? I have recently taken over as Health & Safety Manager for a company that has a few call centres scattered around the UK. I am about to carry out a risk assessment of the activity and noise will be an area that I have to cover off. As part of the risk assessment I would have thought I would need to access the noise level in the call centre to ascertain whether health surveillance was required, does that sound right? Under the new regs, staff exposed to noise levels between or above the action levels would be subject to health surveillance. Any assistance or guidance that you can offer would be greatly appeciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Garry
This subject has been mentioned in the past and you get pointers from searching the previous posts. My opinion would be to carry out audiometric testing as acoustic shock is common in the call centre industry. www.acousticshock.org has some good info and links on it. Another source of info would be the Call Centre association website (CCA)
Garry
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Anthony Rocheford
Are you addressing the ambient/background noise or the actual noise setting on the head sets?
It would be interesting to findout out the spread/variation of settings from workstation to workstation as this might also give an indication of the degree of hearing threshold differences within the work force and give and indication as to the need for health surveillance and possibility of work induced hearing loss that might exist within the environment.
This can also make a case for pre employment hearing test to establish your base line hearing threshold.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David-J-Jones
Les
As we have recently generated a call centre. We have arranged audiometric testing in order to generate a starting point for each person.
Equipment is as recommended ie peak filtration to control sound levels. Risk assessments were based on the hela guidance document that Henrys mentions.
Advice on review period was suprising, we expected initial twelve months then probably three - five years, medical advice was three years for first review.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Les Fullwood
Thank you all for the information, it is greatly appreciated. I am looking to measure both the ambient/background noise and the actual noise setting on the head sets. Many Thanks. Les
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andy Graham-Cumming
I must declare an interest. I am the medical director of the Acoustic Safety Programme.
The majority of call centres are unlikely to provide an environment where noise doses exceed the lower exposure action value defined in The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005. There is likely to be a substantial minority where the LEAV is exceeded, and a small number (possibly up to 10%) where the UEAV is exceeded by some but not all employees. The chances of breaching the exposure limit value are very small indeed.
You also need to take into account the very large proportion of part-time workers whose noise dose will fall well below the level calculated on the basis of a 40-hour week. Call centre headsets that comply with European standards should not pass sound pressure levels above 118dB which is well below the level associated with immediate acoustic trauma, although a very few cases of temporary (less than 1 year) hearing loss have been seen.
Pure tone audiometry has limited relevance in the call centre environment other than as protection for the employer. If somebody leaves work with abnormal audiometry it is best to be able to show that they started out that way. If noise doses in a call centre are below the LEAV there is no need to undertake audiometry for hearing conservation purposes - it is a complete waste of money.
DO NOT HOWEVER CONFUSE HEARING LOSS DUE TO NOISE EXPOSURE WITH ACOUSTIC SHOCK
They are completely different conditions. There is a very poor understanding of acoustic shock syndrome among ENT surgeons, audiologists and occupational health service providers. This is largley because it doesn't fit in with the general understanding of how hearing works, hence the need for research in this area.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.