Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jo Scott Smith
Can anyone share with me how they have met the requirements of the manual handling regs where the manual handling is a different load and a variety of different environments ie the task is different on each occaision.
I can't see how you can do a written assessment on this situation and therefore at the moment are relying on the competence and training of the manual handlers to assess each job in their heads and take suitable precuations (this is backed up with provision of trolleys, training and guidance on what types of load can be refused/referred to a manager/avoided eg by getting someone else to deliver).
The work involves grocery shopping and light domestic removal work.
How do other people deal with the assessment of these kind of tasks? Is there something else that we should be doing to meet requirement of MH regs.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bramall
Jo
Have you tried the HSE MAC tool, available on HSE website?
I have and didnt like it, I worked through the whole thing and when I was finished, there was no indication of what the final score meant.
Instead, we used the other "useful" HSE guidance on manual handling and produced a set of controls based on weight, repetition, length of carry, upper weight limit for single lifting etc.
This has been in force for a short while and certainly appears to be working well. Of course the employees are trained in manual handling and therefore know to check for awkward loads, uneven loads and the like.
Regards
DrB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bramall
Sorry Jo - it's me again.
The thing I don't understand is ;
Manual handling probably the major cause of accident / ill health in many industries. The people who read this forum know this so (since your posting has been on for a while) why has the first response taken so long?
What about a 4th discussion forum called "debates" or something where Mr M ( the moderators) could select a subject, possibly with a bit of controversy, a bit of tongue in cheek etc. but at least start an exchange of views on Mr M's chosen subject.
Sounds good to me.
Drb
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By pedro
To answer your query would require more information. But to say there are different environments and different loads means that you must use the differing environments as the starting point. All manual handling tasks have similar risks and can be covered off by using the the 5 elements of risk assessment including the provision of manual handling equipment, training so on. But if the environment introduces new and differing hazards they must be identified on the environment aspect of the risk assessment and then control measures put in place to reduce or eliminate them.
For example lifting a 10kg box in a warm dry warehouse poses the same manual handling risks as lifting a 10kg box outside in a yard with ice on the floor and freezing rain pouring down. The difference is the conditions and you would have to identify the extra hazard and risk posed by the icy floors and weather conditions.
When training MH you should instruct your trainees to consider the load, enviroment etc when assessing the task in hand. Sorry if I am teaching you to suck eggs but I use TILE - Task Individual Load Environment. This is good at getting them to think laterally about the task as a whole and not just the weight of the item to be lifted or moved. It can also be used when using MH aids such as trollies, sack trucks, pump trucks etc.
Hope this helps a little as a little often goes a long way!
Pedro
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bramall
TILE
Everybody uses that, when they cant think of how to actually control the hazard.
How many risk assessments does one need to cover every situation, at a guess, I would say I would need about 25,000.
1. Lifting a 5Kg .5 X .5 meters bok. no imbalance
2. Lifting a 5kg .5 x .5 metres box. with imbalance
3. Lifting a 10 kg .5 x .5 metres box no imbalance
4. Lifting a 10 kg box ...............with imbalance
5. .................not in a box......with / without balance
6. Lifting a 50 kg load balanced / imbalanced..... box / no box
.................where does it end?
Keep it simple,but not the MAC tool which would be a bigger nightmare.
DrB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By pedro
Well someone is feeling the lack of oxygen looking down from thier high horse aren't they David.
I am capable of controlling hazards and use TILE as way to get the average worker (who has not had the benefit of H&S training) to undertand and identfy the hazards themelves. I would suggest that my answer actually tries to help the origianl poster where yours is about as helpful as a chocolate fireguard!
Maybe its true what most H&S say about the IOSH site forum members that they all think they know everything without actually changing anything!
If you can't be bothered to help people with less knowledge and experience than you then I suggest you start your own website forum and talk to yourself
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp
DrB
To answer your 'rhetorical' question 'Manual handling probably the major cause of accident / ill health in many industries. The people who read this forum know this so (since your posting has been on for a while) why has the first response taken so long?'
I suspect not many forum users really have a good knowledge of manual handling complexities. I know I do not. As the originator of the thread indicated, there are many possible equations and scenarios, trying to assess all the risks is a nightmare, as I recently found out.
Jo, sorry to diverse. Taking into account various load weights, team work (for loads over 100Kg), using stairs and escalators, at night, in dry/wet conditions, the fitness and training of those lifting, sufficient breaks, equipment for carrying etc. Eventually, I designed my own Xcel spreadsheet, but in truth, it never properly reflected the difficulties encountered. That's manual handling for you!
Regards
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By the badger
Jo
Given the nature of the tasks which your people are undertaking, I feel that the approach which you are taking at the moment is exactly right and there is no need to do any more.
In my company we do just the same as you are doing for work like this. We also monitor our accident reports for signs that we might not have got it completely right.
To do any more than this, particularly as regards the production of written assessments, is, in my opinion, unnecessary and would be of no benefit to your organisation or those who are doing the manual handling.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Butler
Try Pristine Condition, expert manual handling trainers with a difference, they will not only train your staff and make a difference, they will help you identify alternative solutions and assess risk from a different angle.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CRT
My advice would be to carry out an initial trawl of your activities to identify and categorise your activities by their level of risk. You could then use "generic" assessments for the lower risk activities, but then carry out a more detailed assessments (as req my MHOR) for the higher risk activities. Incidentally if you use the HSE Mac Tool, it will help to identify circumstances and/or conditions that will increase risk, you can then prioritise these areas for action.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Jo
While the objective is not 'perfection', since back injuries can prove very painful and disabling the careful efforts you are making are advisable.
Three additional measures to consider include
a. notices, written and pictorial (drawings and/or photographs), to regularly prompt recall of safe handling methods
b. inclusion of safe handling as an item regularly in team briefings, especially when people are under a lot of pressure such as when some are off sick or at Chistmas and sales
c. introducing 'behavioural safety processes' so that staff are trained to observe others conducting manual handling for brief periods and authorised regularly those they have observed with feedback on specific handling actions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Darren J Fraser
Hi Jo
If you contact me direct, I may be able to help with a risk assessment that I use, not saying it will cover everything, but you are welcome to cast your eye over it.
Regards
Daz
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.