Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 August 2006 10:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim-F
How do I obtain a CSCS card? does IOSH have a link to CSCS? or do I have to do an 18 month NVQ lev 4? other chartered organisations get 1
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 August 2006 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus
any competent persons should not require a CSCS card to get onto site. All safety bods should boycott and not attend any site requiring them to have them
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 August 2006 11:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
Jim

Do the test the same as everyone else, the test you do will determine the card you get...

The yellow one is a canter. Never been asked for it ever
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 August 2006 11:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
CMIOSH did the ops test 2 min 20 seconds 100% waste of time for me, but do it! saves the hassle of arguing with the CSCS call center bods and you will most likely not be asked for it however the MCG are getting their act together with this.

The HSE have produced a leaflet called 'passport schemes' and they are trying to get other schememes to recognise each other so that you will only have to do the 'core' items, once, and if you move to another site or differing work place you will only have to do the site specific.

That said some one is making dosh fromn this as CCNSG / SPA / CSCS etc etc will not recognise each other so youir people have to suit through the same old syllabus which is trotted out time after time - no wonder people on the coal face think H&S is boring!

Its the same with CHAS / NatBrit Safecontractor/ UDVB etc and other certification.

Why not recognise each other!!

Come on someone in these organsiations make the case!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 August 2006 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dee
You used to be exempt from having to sit the Health and Safety Test if you had the NEBOSH Construction Certificate, not sure if this is still the case.

Anyway, that's what I did and that allowed me the Gold Level Card (which I think is supervisory level)

Dee
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 August 2006 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
The perpetual running sore this one. If you do not have a relevant construction related. NVQ the best you will ever do curently is the visitors card or the H&S`officer's card.

Even the proposed CDM acop only uses CSCS as an example. There are discussions afoot in IOSH but not in terms of submitting to CSCS. I would again urge people with specific issues to tell me or Hazel Harvey or a member of the construction SG committee of your problems directly.

Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 August 2006 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
NEBOSH Contruction cert means a waiver and you still get the gold card etc.

However if you are a Nebosh Dip / NVQ6 etc and CMIOSH with 25 years experience, who can teach the Cons Cert you still have to do the test.

Crazy or what!

Its all in thewording as the CSCS people on their helpline have a script they read from to answer queries and do not understand what is being said to them.

"Sorry only exemption is Nebosh Cons Cert"

However not to tar CSCS the SPA / CCNSG are the same they will not recognise the others either.

As an ex EHO and CMIOSH i had to sit a two day course before I was allowed to visit our guys on site at a food manufacturer and pay for the priviledge! There is only so much of HASW Act Sect 2 says this and MWSW Regs says this I could stand.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 August 2006 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith
If you look on the CSCS web site, their detailed description for the competencies required for a Planning Supervisor and Health and Safety Manager are exactly the same.

It will be interesting to know how they are going to assess the competence of the Coordinator next year.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 08 August 2006 17:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
And even then Dave it has to be less than a certain age - think it is 3 years but may be less.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 08 August 2006 20:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David S Burt
I do not believe that the CSCS scheme is perfect from a health & Safety point of view but I find the attitude of a number of Health & Safety people towards it very strange.

Health & Safety professionals are always telling Senior Managers that they need to lead by example. However when these same Health & Safety people are required to obtain a CSCS card there is nothing but whinges and gripes.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 09 August 2006 08:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Battman
Agree totally, get over it and get the card.

If you want to start an argumnent on here all you have to do is put CSCS in your topic name.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 09 August 2006 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
To the last two respondents.

Do you both think it is reasonable that a CMIOSH with the Construction Certificate and 15 years as a H&S Professional, a substantial amount of it on building sites, should have to sit a 'vote for joe' type examination (which I think most of us believe to be an insult to the intelligence).

Surely it would be reasonable to expect an exemption for valid qualification and experience?

I don't think this topic is anything to do with 'leading by example' - more a common sense issue.



Admin  
#13 Posted : 09 August 2006 10:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
The last point stick with any certification even IOSH, so would expect yes I need put my money where my mouth is and sit the test like everyone else to get my wee yellow card or gold card or whatever, but it does not mean that I am happy about it. Dave's point is why should you sit CSCS then still have to do SPA and CCNSG why do they not aknowledge each others validity which is true for all trades, it's not sitting the one test it more the number of test you have to sit

Admin  
#14 Posted : 09 August 2006 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Battman
I think that what is being forgotten here is that CSCS is a construction card that confirms personnel safety on site.
CMIOSH does not prove competency in construction.
CMIOSH may be gained by someone working in the retail industry, food processing, etc. What knowledge would such people have of the hazards of the construction industry?
I am a construction professional, I would not consider myself competent in any other industry.

So whilst I agree that exemptions should exist. CMIOSH alone is not sufficient.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 09 August 2006 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Battman
Sorry that should have been personal
Admin  
#16 Posted : 09 August 2006 11:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Salus
CSCS is a money making scam that does nothing to enhance safety on site.
As soon as operatives take the test they are back out on site and into their own "work mind set", earning money.
It drives an even bigger wedge (operatives think it is a waste of their time and money, and who is at the forefront of these thoughts "the safety guys / gals" that are on or have to visit site)and makes it even harder for safety personnel to get the workers on site to "buy" in to H & S.
Go out and ask any person on site whether they would have it or not.
Why should already competent people(and I do not want replies about what industry you are in, why would you be on a construction site if you worked in the food or retail industry)be humiliated by asking them to take a test where probally 99% of people who take it pass.
If you want safety on site why is it not a condition that every one should have the Const.Cert; reason most would not pass and so we would not have a construction industry.
CITB / Insurance company led or what.
getting on with the personnel on site and Working together is what enhances safety on site not these jumped up money making schemes.


Probally for another thread, has anyone actually observed how operatives gain their NVQ's when they are assessed on site.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 09 August 2006 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Battman
So I take it you don't agree with the CSCS scheme
Admin  
#18 Posted : 09 August 2006 13:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK
Speaking personally, as a planning supervisor I do not frequently get to site during construction works. The CSCS test did provide me with some information regarding a few site safety issues I was not aware of and have never needed to know yet, but may be useful for me to know at some point.
I will go on to say that in my humble opinion, any system by which general health and safety competence or awareness may be improved on construction sites cant be all bad.

However, in some cases however the systems flaws are being exploited by some large companies who apply en masse for the CSCS scheme and have their consultants sit the test for managers, but in the final application process award senior consulting designers with 10 years site experience with a yellow card (operative level) which the website gives the example of being for delivery drivers, while awarding more senior managers with the black managers card. Incidentally some higher-level experienced managers do actually fail the CSCS test

Interesting no?
Admin  
#19 Posted : 09 August 2006 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Salus

Some very pertinent points. I have observed the NVQ process in action with one of the better construction training companies. They are very good at it but even they cannot assess H&S competence - it is still the touch screen test or bust. This test is actually part of the NVQ requirements!!! Their view is astonishment that they are competent to assess the trade skills but are barred from using IOSH members on their staff to assess H&S competency. But they have to comply in order to achieve their target training needs.

The CSCS touch screen is merely a very basic knowledge test - It has nothing to do with personal competence in H&S, or perhaps even personal safety. So there is for me little benefit to be gained, like many I have been an IOSH corporate member for over 20 years and active in construction since the early 1980s so I recognise the real frustrations felt by many. The anticipated changes will merely mean that few H&S practitioners in my position will qualify for anything other than a visitor card ultimately.

I suppose the flip side of the issue is the very good lobbying skills that have been applied by CSCS to such as the MCG. The scheme has been seen as the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. It seems to be forgotten that the end of the rainbow is actually nowhere to be found in reality - it always moves. We need to geet to a point where contractors and others have an evidenced competence management system which controls not just the usual SKATE but also attitude and behaviour of all levels of employee involved in construction work. Use of professionally recognised CPD in a recognised chartered or royal charter body is the start of such a system but more needs to be done.

Bob
Admin  
#20 Posted : 09 August 2006 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man
I think that Michael makes a very valid point around competence.

CSCS is just another membership scheme - like IOSH. If you are suggesting that CSCS (or an alternative scheme) should not be a requisite for construction work, then are you also happy to accept that H&S professionals do not need to be a member of IOSH?

If people think that the tests for these cards are below them, then perhaps they should not bother undertaking construction work. It is very dangerous to dismiss 'easy' tests - there is a risk that you can get so engrossed in detail and overlook some of the basics.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 09 August 2006 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Iain michie
Prior to the CSCS/CPCS route plant operatives and site operatives had to attednd a one day Site Safety Awareness Course, duration 8 hours, 6 hours tuition (which was comulsary). This course consisted of written test papers and case studies which everyone had to do. The Assessor/Instructor was then able to identify training needs and used different methods of assessment. When delivering this course myself I found a greater number of the candidates had a better understanding of their duties and responsibilities and a higher number of candidates passed the final exam.

The problem I have found with the touch screen test, is that 2 weeks prior to sitting the test the candidates receive the 'BOOK' with sample questions and answers, how many actually read it? not many.

When this test was first introduced it had a high failure rate, 78%, and at a cost of £35.00 per head (£50.00 Isle of man) it became very costly with the re-sit fees. Cost has now been reduced to £17.50 but the candidate is responsible to buy his/her own book at a cost of £9.99. This still does not guarantee a pass or does it provide evidence of a candidates level of competence.

I Hold a CSCS Platinum card and all I had to do is attend The Construction Site Managers Safety Training Scheme, where as now, whether you are a graduate or not you have to register for an NVQ, I'm unsure whether I will be exempt when I come to renew it, enen though I have my NEBOSH Construction.

I read the comment about how NVQ Assessments are carried out, I do agree that there are number of Cow-Boy outfits and it is a money spinner, however there are a number of very goog training providers out there who will provide you with a service that is second to none.

Yes there are guys that will carry on doing their own thing and getting on with the job, even after trining and assessment, but surely this is a supervision problem on site.........
Admin  
#22 Posted : 09 August 2006 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Iain

I used to teach the full day site course for NPORS (and have a construction certificate) - and still had to take the test!

My reward - a CSCS yellow 'construction site visitor' card that expires in 2011, which is compulsory on some sites, but no one has ever looked at.

The comment about 'easy tests' and people thinking the tests are below them is disingenuous. I'm more than happy to put up a couple of example questions if this line is pursued - to show how stupid some of them are.

Admin  
#23 Posted : 14 August 2006 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
cant remember who said that CMIOSH should still do the test! poppy cock!! if you are CMIOSH and get one question wrong on this then you should not be in safety!

This CSCS along with CCNSG / SPA and any other passport scheme will not improve safety on any site!!! although well intentioned it is way for some companies to get money out of contractors or why won't the recognise each other??

200 staff CSCS / SPA / CCNSG Petro / Food etc is a fair amount of wedge out of any budget.

Our guys look like Mr 'T' from the 'A' team with the amount of cards and passes they have around their necks.

As far as the stop winging brigade, we have bitten the bullet and done them all at great expense, thats not the point its the time effort and money invested for concievably nothing (about 700 working days!). a utilities safety management company asked for sheds of money to be 'Safety accredited' so we could work on utilities contracts or should I say get on their approved list with no promise of any work, although we have CHAS / ARCA / NAT Brit Safecontractor and CSCS Gold cert etc no exemption!! and hey ho could all can be done by email!!!!

You guys in construction fair enough CSCS is your way but what about other companies who are active in all work areas?
Admin  
#24 Posted : 14 August 2006 16:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham
Dave your spot on

Even doing all the training you can in house it still cost time and money and the material your given (or bought under licence for a'wedge') and have to deliver is nowhere near good enough.

I used to have the same gripes, between construction sites, petols stations, food manufacturing and processing plants, airports, breweries shopping malls, MOD, Rail, local councils............... all looking for different cards (argg indeed)

G'
Admin  
#25 Posted : 15 August 2006 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
I agree with Dave Wilson on this.
My company suffers too with so many schemes, time & money wasted for absolutely no benefit..

What a pity "Europe's leading body for H&S practitioners" can't take a lead in sorting out this dogs breakfast.

Would make far more sense and have more long term benefits than hitching its wagon to the Olympic games - which I predict will be a fiasco to match the dome & wembley.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 15 August 2006 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Before anyone says you do get a benefit, In my industry ALL staff operatives / Supervisors / managers have to undergo mandatory ANNUALLY examined H&S training (80% pass) as part of our conditions to hold a licence, so if anyone in the construction industry wants to question our guys about Asbestos safety you cant!! as you need a card and I can do this training for you at £120 a day,and has to be done annually.

I have just started a new card safety scheme!! Any takers????

Thought not!

If Asbestos is the biggest industrial killer the world has ever seen then why do CSCS not examine this??
Admin  
#27 Posted : 16 August 2006 12:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Stupendous Man, you wrote:

"If people think that the tests for these cards are below them, then perhaps they should not bother undertaking construction work. It is very dangerous to dismiss 'easy' tests - there is a risk that you can get so engrossed in detail and overlook some of the basics."

In light of the inputs since your last comment (above) do you still have the same view?

Is



Admin  
#28 Posted : 16 August 2006 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Mulholland
MAK

you state "as a planning supervisor I do not frequently get to site during construction works"

Could you expand on why this is the case?

A Planning Supervisor should be involved in a Construction Project througout its life cycle and not just at the start.

The PLanning Supervisor should be involved in regular meetings with all CDM Players discussing issues as they occur. Where there are design changes (which is VERY often the case) the Planning Supervisor should be assisting as well.

In my experience the PS is all about the "front end" of a project and little else.

Sorry.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 16 August 2006 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man
Is Kismet, yes I do still stand by my comments. As Dave Wilson said in one of his postings

'if you are CMIOSH and get one question wrong on this then you should not be in safety!'

Unless you do the test, how are to know if you will get a question wrong?

Admin  
#30 Posted : 16 August 2006 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet
Stupendous Man

Interesting that you have taken another contributors statement out of context.

I was hoping that a forum such as this, with some sensible contributions, might have changed (or at least modified) your view.



Admin  
#31 Posted : 16 August 2006 15:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
Hi Martin,
Not denying MAK his chance to respond, but it is one of the nuances of the planning supervisor's role that it is actually possible to do an excellent job without ever visiting the site. The role is one of enabler and coordinator (hence job title change next year). If the dutyholders that make up the project team are proficient in their provision of information and their communication chain etc, the PS can ensure the safety of the project from the drawings on the board to the demolition in 2076 without ever leaving their office!
Admin  
#32 Posted : 16 August 2006 18:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
I looked at this some time ago and found I had to do the test even though I was MIOSH, RSP

The cost was £20.00 and I got the H & S Manager (Construction) Industry Accreditation. Not sure how fast I did the test but scored 100% no problem.

You just have to apply for the right grade.
Admin  
#33 Posted : 16 August 2006 20:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Advanced Safety
As much as i am not a complete believer in the way the CSCS system is set-up, i dont think that MIOSH/CMIOSH or CFIOSH automatically gives the holder of this designation suitable construction Health & Safety Knowledge. Throughout my studying over the years i have encountered many senarios and questions regarding Confined Spaces. Although i can highlight Legislation and safe practices to follow, i would not deem myself competent to enter one, as i have never entered one before. A general practitioner may be very qualified, but may never have entered a construction site before. (probably a bit out of context, but i know what i mean!) ha! ha!
Admin  
#34 Posted : 17 August 2006 18:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Expat Safety
Excellent response by Advance Safety. As a Construction HSE bod I could not agree more!!! As
Admin  
#35 Posted : 17 August 2006 20:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Advanced Safety
Expat

Sanctury! Thought i was the only Construction bod here. Was begining to feel like the muddy loner.
Admin  
#36 Posted : 17 August 2006 21:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By p winter
Come on guys - should we not set a good example here - if we expect everyone else to do the test should we not do so?
Admin  
#37 Posted : 18 August 2006 09:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By IT
Another here Advanced Safety.

MCG requires membership of CSCS as proof of competency in construction and fully support the scheme ,so its quite simple NO card / NO Site Access as per site inductions.it is also an audit for supply chain in construction for the main contractors.

BTW

CMIOSH member just applied for his card and was given a supervisor card as the scheme does not recognise MSc (his words) ,you must hold NVQ 4 to hold the platinum card for Safety Manager like mine ;)

And fully agree with p winter walk the walk ,lead by example

Admin  
#38 Posted : 18 August 2006 12:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Its not about construction H&S bods its about making F/CMIOSH do a touch screen test which a general site labourer has to take, I am not advocating the issue of wholesale give outs of black / platinum cards etc. I will say again if any CMIOSH does not get 100% on thisd he should not be insafety. Me 2min 24seconds as quick as the PC could bring up the questions 100% waste of my complete time!!!

A well known safety management company have today just issued that they are going to install yet another scheme where you have to do this Safety Passport for pharmacutical sites - when will it ever end.

Specific site induction - totally agree!!!! but sitting through another day of sect 2 says that management regs says this give me strength!!
Admin  
#39 Posted : 18 August 2006 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By IT
Dave,

CSCS is not about F/CMIOSH or whatever it is a standard to establish competence, a word I see in many posts on this forum.

It is the ACCEPTED industry competency measure, you don’t have to do it, but then they don’t have to let you on site either.

What’s more embarrassing sitting a 2 minute test or being escorted from site as an F/CMIOSH member without it?



Admin  
#40 Posted : 18 August 2006 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
You are missing the point, its not about safety competence on site as this certaininly doesn't do that, as you can fail as many times as you like, its about remembering the questions.

Should a H&S Professional be required to do a general site labourers H&S test, considering that most F/CMIOSHers can teach the construction certificate, which exempts you. The point is why can you not get the exemption fvrom taking this , but with what is a 'lower' qualification you can! Why will does our annually examined H&S test not enough, Why do National Brittania / SPA / CCNSG or any other passport scheme not recognise the others.

Why do asbestos removal ops need to know the depth of a trench!

No one seems to be putting a case for that - Why not I may ask?

Site induction which we get on most sites is very good - as it deals with the site issues, but to say because you have not passed this then you will not be allowed on site is quite honestly laughable!

Why do construction workers enter our Asbestos Zone / respirator zone which is so obvious to have a 'look', why is there no asbestos Questions on the CSCS test - or is there! 3500 dead people this year alone.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.