Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Please consider the following:
DSE assessment carried out some years ago with recommendations for improvement, i.e. new desk with PC set up as per DSE Regs.
Recommendations still not put in place despite continual reminders from the User,
The User involved in the assessment has RSI from a previous workplace and is in receipt of DLA benefit, and is now finding the condition worsens when using the equipment (PC etc.), the current employer was and still is aware of the previous condition.
The User has been off work for 2 weeks with a medical certificate provided by her GP but the employer decided to log the time off as Special Leave.
The user is now back in work but there is no change in the position and not much progress forecast.
Questions:
1/ How should the time off be reported/recorded, is it a 3 day workplace injury or an Industrial Disease i.e. a musculoskeletal disorder.
2/ Is the employer guilty of negligence.
3/ How best to take the issue further bearing in mind that the user would just like to attend work and do her job without incurring any pain or suffering, and is not interested in claiming compensation, however there is a chance she may lose her job if she takes much more time off work and is unable to work at the workstation as it is now.
The employer is a large government agency and there are trade union safety reps who will be getting involved with this problem.
Any thoughts will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Simon Walsh Grad IOSH
I believe RSI is reportable as a major injury under RIDDOR. As for negligence claim, my assumption would be they do have a claim as the terms of the DSE assessment have not been implemented, the employer is fully aware of this persons existing, and now worsening injury. The civil case Paris v Stepney Borough Council may be relevant here.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Young
As RSI is not a recognised illness, it isn't reportable. There are certain "ULD's" that are reportable under certain conditions, they are stated in the guide to RIDDOR.
However, with a known previous condition and the employers intransigence to make reasonable adjustment even after it was recommended by competent? assessment, I'd say the employer was skating on thin ice and is open to a potential claim. Get the health and safety manager/officer and the union involved ASAP.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Paris v Stepney Borough Council is very interesting, thank you, however I wonder if anyone knows of similar claims where ULD is involved?
Just to let you know the existing condition is recorded as Writers Cramp - cramp of the hand and forearm which is listed as a prescribed disease/illness. The User is in receipt of Industrial Injuries Benefit and this is a Life Award! The condition is worsening as a result of using the PC in its present set up.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Maj
Having just dealt with a similar situation with Managers dragging their feet in implementing the recommendations of the DSE assessment, with a person suffering from a diagnosed ULD The fact that the person is claiming Industrial Injuries benefits and presumably the Employer knowing of the pre-existing condition, would hold them liable. You do not mention whether HR have been involved in this, presumably as a Government Agency all of the relevant HR procedures should be in place and adopted. The Employer, in my opinion, would not have much redress should the person involved wished to take further action. As a minimum, she should be advised to log all requests made to the employer regarding work station set up and get the Unions involved immediately.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
HR Dept. is involved in the form of the health & safety people who carried out the original assessment/s and made recommendations. It now appears that the original paperwork has been lost and an exercise in covering tracks has begun.
Trade Union safety reps are now aware and recommend Garden Leave should be taken until correct equipment is provided, but the empoyer cannot just take Garden Leave without authorisation from the employer.
The User has a job designation which requires her to operate a PC as integral part of her job. There are no other jobs in her workplace that she can do without training therefore she will attend work and have to refuse to work.
Any ideas on how best to proceed?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Maj
Does the Employee have a copy of the Assessment. I believe the way forward with this is to escalate the problem as high as you can. You could explain that the pre-existing medical condition for which industrial injuries benefit is paid is being exacerbated by the lack of appropriate work station set up. It maybe that she will require occupational health specialists to get involved which should not be too difficult for a Government Agency. It is, in my opinion, totally unacceptable for this situation to continue as it is. If you are the Safety Adviser for this facility, you should perhaps write to a Senior Manger expressing your concerns and stating that DSE assessment is a legal requirement.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
The employee/user is actually my wife, I am not the H & S for the company, if I was I would hope to have this sorted out a long time ago.
No copy of the assessment but there is a memo referring to the assessment.
All responses to this thread have been excellent and consistent and support our case. Thank you all.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.